[PATCH 0/5] Fix regression introduced by set_irq_flags() removal
Russell King - ARM Linux
linux at arm.linux.org.uk
Tue Oct 20 07:17:36 PDT 2015
On Tue, Oct 20, 2015 at 04:08:28PM +0200, Thomas Petazzoni wrote:
> As discussed on IRC, another simpler (code line wise) solution is to
> simply clear the IRQ_NOAUTOEN flag in the irq-armada-370-xp, which
> brings us back to what set_irq_flags() was doing, without actually
> reverting Rob's patch.
>
> However, relying on IRQ_NOAUTOEN being cleared doesn't seem like the
> right long term solution, which is why I implemented what I believe is
> a (hopefully) better long term solution.
However, this is rather worrying. NOAUTOEN is supposed to avoid enabling
the interrupt when the interrupt is claimed.
If, as a result of Rob's patch, we now have a load of IRQs which are
marked with NOAUTOEN which weren't, that's quite a large regression -
possibly one which hasn't been properly found (not everyone tests -rc
kernels) and we may be better to revert Rob's patch to avoid lots of
breakge being reported when 4.3 is released.
I think Rob's patches need another review in light of this, to determine
how much breakage there is here, and a decision how to proceed made on
that basis.
--
FTTC broadband for 0.8mile line: currently at 9.6Mbps down 400kbps up
according to speedtest.net.
More information about the linux-arm-kernel
mailing list