[PATCH v1 3/6] thermal: rockchip: Support the RK3368 SoCs in thermal driver
Caesar Wang
caesar.upstream at gmail.com
Wed Nov 4 20:54:03 PST 2015
Hello Eduardo,
Thanks your comments.
在 2015年11月04日 01:48, Eduardo Valentin 写道:
> Hello Caesar,
>
> On Thu, Oct 29, 2015 at 03:14:15PM +0800, Caesar Wang wrote:
>> The RK3368 SoCs support to 2 channel TS-ADC, the temperature criteria
>> of each channel can be configurable.
>>
>> The system has two Temperature Sensors, channel 0 is for CPU,
>> and channel 1 is for GPU.
> Please improve your patch description. I dont think this patch only
> adds the support for RK3368.
>
> I see, for example, at least two other (maybe dependencies of the
> new chip support) changes:
>
> - conversion function improvement
> - tshut value/temperature configuration
>
> Could you please split this patch in smaller changes?
Okay, Done.
That's on my local oneline.
92ffb82 thermal: rockchip: Support the RK3368 SoCs in thermal drivers
e4f5e61 thermal: rockchip: Add the flag for adc value increment or decrement
b599a6b thermal: rockchip: improve the conversion function
d629c52 thermal: rockchip: trivial: fix typo in commit
I will send these in next version.
>> Signed-off-by: Caesar Wang <wxt at rock-chips.com>
>>
>> ---
>>
>> Changes in v1:
>> - As Dmitry comment, make the conversion table in as a parameter.
>>
> Are you sure that this version implements this suggestion?
>
>
>> drivers/thermal/rockchip_thermal.c | 183 ++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++-----
>> 1 file changed, 158 insertions(+), 25 deletions(-)
>>
>> diff --git a/drivers/thermal/rockchip_thermal.c b/drivers/thermal/rockchip_thermal.c
>> index f96c151..4748a8e 100644
>> --- a/drivers/thermal/rockchip_thermal.c
>> +++ b/drivers/thermal/rockchip_thermal.c
>> @@ -1,6 +1,9 @@
>> /*
>> * Copyright (c) 2014, Fuzhou Rockchip Electronics Co., Ltd
>> *
>> + * Copyright (c) 2015, Fuzhou Rockchip Electronics Co., Ltd
>> + * Caesar Wang <wxt at rock-chips.com>
>> + *
>> * This program is free software; you can redistribute it and/or modify it
>> * under the terms and conditions of the GNU General Public License,
>> * version 2, as published by the Free Software Foundation.
>> @@ -75,8 +78,12 @@ struct rockchip_tsadc_chip {
>>
>> /* Per-sensor methods */
>> int (*get_temp)(int chn, void __iomem *reg, int *temp);
>> - void (*set_tshut_temp)(int chn, void __iomem *reg, long temp);
>> + void (*set_tshut_value)(int chn, void __iomem *reg, u32 value);
> Do you have any explanation why do you need to change from temp to
> value? Can you include this in your patch description?
Okay, I think that's *not* really needed.
I have removed this change.
>> void (*set_tshut_mode)(int chn, void __iomem *reg, enum tshut_mode m);
>> +
>> + /* Per-table methods */
>> + const struct tsadc_table *table;
>> + int table_num;
>> };
>>
>> struct rockchip_thermal_sensor {
>> @@ -102,7 +109,7 @@ struct rockchip_thermal_data {
>> enum tshut_polarity tshut_polarity;
>> };
>>
>> -/* TSADC V2 Sensor info define: */
>> +/* TSADC Sensor info define: */
>> #define TSADCV2_AUTO_CON 0x04
>> #define TSADCV2_INT_EN 0x08
>> #define TSADCV2_INT_PD 0x0c
>> @@ -124,6 +131,8 @@ struct rockchip_thermal_data {
>> #define TSADCV2_INT_PD_CLEAR_MASK ~BIT(8)
>>
>> #define TSADCV2_DATA_MASK 0xfff
>> +#define TSADCV3_DATA_MASK 0x3ff
>> +
>> #define TSADCV2_HIGHT_INT_DEBOUNCE_COUNT 4
>> #define TSADCV2_HIGHT_TSHUT_DEBOUNCE_COUNT 4
>> #define TSADCV2_AUTO_PERIOD_TIME 250 /* msec */
>> @@ -172,21 +181,62 @@ static const struct tsadc_table v2_code_table[] = {
>> {3421, 125000},
>> };
>>
>> -static u32 rk_tsadcv2_temp_to_code(long temp)
>> +static const struct tsadc_table v3_code_table[] = {
>> + {0, -40000},
>> + {106, -40000},
>> + {108, -35000},
>> + {110, -30000},
>> + {112, -25000},
>> + {114, -20000},
>> + {116, -15000},
>> + {118, -10000},
>> + {120, -5000},
>> + {122, 0},
>> + {124, 5000},
>> + {126, 10000},
>> + {128, 15000},
>> + {130, 20000},
>> + {132, 25000},
>> + {134, 30000},
>> + {136, 35000},
>> + {138, 40000},
>> + {140, 45000},
>> + {142, 50000},
>> + {144, 55000},
>> + {146, 60000},
>> + {148, 65000},
>> + {150, 70000},
>> + {152, 75000},
>> + {154, 80000},
>> + {156, 85000},
>> + {158, 90000},
>> + {160, 95000},
>> + {162, 100000},
>> + {163, 105000},
>> + {165, 110000},
>> + {167, 115000},
>> + {169, 120000},
>> + {171, 125000},
>> + {TSADCV3_DATA_MASK, 125000},
>> +};
>> +
>> +static u32 rk_tsadcv2_temp_to_code(const struct rockchip_tsadc_chip *chip,
>> + long temp)
>> {
> This function receives the chip structure as parameter...
Okay, we should do the table as a parameter.
>> + const struct tsadc_table *table = chip->table;
>> int high, low, mid;
>>
>> low = 0;
>> - high = ARRAY_SIZE(v2_code_table) - 1;
>> + high = chip->table_num - 1;
>> mid = (high + low) / 2;
>>
>> - if (temp < v2_code_table[low].temp || temp > v2_code_table[high].temp)
>> + if (temp < table[low].temp || temp > table[high].temp)
>> return 0;
>>
>> while (low <= high) {
>> - if (temp == v2_code_table[mid].temp)
>> - return v2_code_table[mid].code;
>> - else if (temp < v2_code_table[mid].temp)
>> + if (temp == table[mid].temp)
>> + return table[mid].code;
>> + else if (temp < table[mid].temp)
>> high = mid - 1;
>> else
>> low = mid + 1;
> And seams to do the work.. but..
>
> I am assuming you have forgotten to continue the change in the remaining
> functions: rk_tsadcv2_code_to_temp:
>
> 215
> 216 /*
> 217 * The 5C granularity provided by the table is too much. Let's
> 218 * assume that the relationship between sensor readings and
> 219 * temperature between 2 table entries is linear and interpolate
> 220 * to produce less granular result.
> 221 */
> 222 num = v2_code_table[mid].temp - v2_code_table[mid - 1].temp;
> 223 num *= v2_code_table[mid - 1].code - code;
> 224 denom = v2_code_table[mid - 1].code - v2_code_table[mid].code;
> 225 *temp = v2_code_table[mid - 1].temp + (num / denom);
> 226
>
>
> Please finish the change in rk_tsadcv2_code_to_temp, to use chip->table, and
>
>
>
>> @@ -235,16 +285,59 @@ static int rk_tsadcv2_code_to_temp(u32 code, int *temp)
>> return 0;
>> }
>>
>> +static int rk_tsadcv3_code_to_temp(u32 code, int *temp)
>> +{
>> + unsigned int low = 1;
>> + unsigned int high = ARRAY_SIZE(v3_code_table) - 1;
>> + unsigned int mid = (low + high) / 2;
>> + unsigned int num;
>> + unsigned long denom;
>> +
>> + BUILD_BUG_ON(ARRAY_SIZE(v3_code_table) < 2);
>> +
>> + code &= TSADCV3_DATA_MASK;
>> + if (code < v3_code_table[low].code)
>> + return -EAGAIN; /* Incorrect reading */
>> +
>> + while (low <= high) {
>> + if (code >= v3_code_table[mid - 1].code &&
>> + code < v3_code_table[mid].code)
>> + break;
>> + else if (code > v3_code_table[mid].code)
>> + low = mid + 1;
>> + else
>> + high = mid - 1;
>> + mid = (low + high) / 2;
>> + }
>> +
>> + /*
>> + * The 5C granularity provided by the table is too much. Let's
>> + * assume that the relationship between sensor readings and
>> + * temperature between 2 table entries is linear and interpolate
>> + * to produce less granular result.
>> + */
>> + num = v3_code_table[mid].temp - v3_code_table[mid - 1].temp;
>> + num *= code - v3_code_table[mid - 1].code;
>> + denom = v3_code_table[mid].code - v3_code_table[mid - 1].code;
>> + *temp = v3_code_table[mid - 1].temp + (num / denom);
>> +
>> + return 0;
>> +}
> Do not add the above function, as it is a code duplication of
> rk_tsadcv2_code_to_temp. The above function, functionality wise, the same
> as rk_tsadcv2_code_to_temp, except that it uses a different table.
>
> The suggestion is to pass the table as parameter to rk_tsadcv2_code_to_temp,
> then just reuse rk_tsadcv2_code_to_temp in both cases.
>
> Would that work for you?
Thanks, I think that's ok on next version.
>> +
>> /**
>> - * rk_tsadcv2_initialize - initialize TASDC Controller
>> - * (1) Set TSADCV2_AUTO_PERIOD, configure the interleave between
>> - * every two accessing of TSADC in normal operation.
>> - * (2) Set TSADCV2_AUTO_PERIOD_HT, configure the interleave between
>> - * every two accessing of TSADC after the temperature is higher
>> - * than COM_SHUT or COM_INT.
>> - * (3) Set TSADCV2_HIGH_INT_DEBOUNCE and TSADC_HIGHT_TSHUT_DEBOUNCE,
>> - * if the temperature is higher than COMP_INT or COMP_SHUT for
>> - * "debounce" times, TSADC controller will generate interrupt or TSHUT.
>> + * rk_tsadcv2_initialize - initialize TASDC Controller.
>> + *
>> + * (1) Set TSADC_V2_AUTO_PERIOD:
>> + * Configure the interleave between every two accessing of
>> + * TSADC in normal operation.
>> + *
>> + * (2) Set TSADCV2_AUTO_PERIOD_HT:
>> + * Configure the interleave between every two accessing of
>> + * TSADC after the temperature is higher than COM_SHUT or COM_INT.
>> + *
>> + * (3) Set TSADCV2_HIGH_INT_DEBOUNCE and TSADC_HIGHT_TSHUT_DEBOUNCE:
>> + * If the temperature is higher than COMP_INT or COMP_SHUT for
>> + * "debounce" times, TSADC controller will generate interrupt or TSHUT.
>> */
>> static void rk_tsadcv2_initialize(void __iomem *regs,
>> enum tshut_polarity tshut_polarity)
>> @@ -286,6 +379,15 @@ static void rk_tsadcv2_control(void __iomem *regs, bool enable)
>> writel_relaxed(val, regs + TSADCV2_AUTO_CON);
>> }
>>
>> +static int rk_tsadcv3_get_temp(int chn, void __iomem *regs, int *temp)
>> +{
>> + u32 val;
>> +
>> + val = readl_relaxed(regs + TSADCV2_DATA(chn));
>> +
>> + return rk_tsadcv3_code_to_temp(val, temp);
>> +}
> Same suggestion here. This function looks exactly the same as rk_tsadcv2_get_temp. can you just pass the chip as parameter, then?
Done, make a table as a parameter.
>> +
>> static int rk_tsadcv2_get_temp(int chn, void __iomem *regs, int *temp)
>> {
>> u32 val;
>> @@ -295,12 +397,11 @@ static int rk_tsadcv2_get_temp(int chn, void __iomem *regs, int *temp)
>> return rk_tsadcv2_code_to_temp(val, temp);
>> }
>>
>> -static void rk_tsadcv2_tshut_temp(int chn, void __iomem *regs, long temp)
>> +static void rk_tsadcv2_tshut_value(int chn, void __iomem *regs, u32 value)
>> {
>> - u32 tshut_value, val;
>> + u32 val;
>>
>> - tshut_value = rk_tsadcv2_temp_to_code(temp);
>> - writel_relaxed(tshut_value, regs + TSADCV2_COMP_SHUT(chn));
>> + writel_relaxed(value, regs + TSADCV2_COMP_SHUT(chn));
>>
>> /* TSHUT will be valid */
>> val = readl_relaxed(regs + TSADCV2_AUTO_CON);
>> @@ -337,8 +438,31 @@ static const struct rockchip_tsadc_chip rk3288_tsadc_data = {
>> .irq_ack = rk_tsadcv2_irq_ack,
>> .control = rk_tsadcv2_control,
>> .get_temp = rk_tsadcv2_get_temp,
>> - .set_tshut_temp = rk_tsadcv2_tshut_temp,
>> + .set_tshut_value = rk_tsadcv2_tshut_value,
>> + .set_tshut_mode = rk_tsadcv2_tshut_mode,
>> +
>> + .table = v2_code_table,
>> + .table_num = ARRAY_SIZE(v2_code_table),
>> +};
>> +
>> +static const struct rockchip_tsadc_chip rk3368_tsadc_data = {
>> + .chn_id[SENSOR_CPU] = 0, /* cpu sensor is channel 0 */
>> + .chn_id[SENSOR_GPU] = 1, /* gpu sensor is channel 1 */
>> + .chn_num = 2, /* two channels for tsadc */
>> +
>> + .tshut_mode = TSHUT_MODE_GPIO, /* default TSHUT via GPIO give PMIC */
>> + .tshut_polarity = TSHUT_LOW_ACTIVE, /* default TSHUT LOW ACTIVE */
>> + .tshut_temp = 95000,
>> +
>> + .initialize = rk_tsadcv2_initialize,
>> + .irq_ack = rk_tsadcv2_irq_ack,
>> + .control = rk_tsadcv2_control,
>> + .get_temp = rk_tsadcv3_get_temp,
>> + .set_tshut_value = rk_tsadcv2_tshut_value,
>> .set_tshut_mode = rk_tsadcv2_tshut_mode,
>> +
>> + .table = v3_code_table,
>> + .table_num = ARRAY_SIZE(v3_code_table),
>> };
>>
>> static const struct of_device_id of_rockchip_thermal_match[] = {
>> @@ -346,6 +470,10 @@ static const struct of_device_id of_rockchip_thermal_match[] = {
>> .compatible = "rockchip,rk3288-tsadc",
>> .data = (void *)&rk3288_tsadc_data,
>> },
>> + {
>> + .compatible = "rockchip,rk3368-tsadc",
>> + .data = (void *)&rk3368_tsadc_data,
>> + },
>> { /* end */ },
>> };
>> MODULE_DEVICE_TABLE(of, of_rockchip_thermal_match);
>> @@ -458,8 +586,10 @@ rockchip_thermal_register_sensor(struct platform_device *pdev,
>> const struct rockchip_tsadc_chip *tsadc = thermal->chip;
>> int error;
>>
>> + u32 tshut_value = rk_tsadcv2_temp_to_code(tsadc, thermal->tshut_temp);
>> +
>> tsadc->set_tshut_mode(id, thermal->regs, thermal->tshut_mode);
>> - tsadc->set_tshut_temp(id, thermal->regs, thermal->tshut_temp);
>> + tsadc->set_tshut_value(id, thermal->regs, tshut_value);
>>
>> sensor->thermal = thermal;
>> sensor->id = id;
>> @@ -660,6 +790,9 @@ static int __maybe_unused rockchip_thermal_resume(struct device *dev)
>> int i;
>> int error;
>>
>> + u32 tshut_value = rk_tsadcv2_temp_to_code(thermal->chip,
>> + thermal->tshut_temp);
>> +
>> error = clk_enable(thermal->clk);
>> if (error)
>> return error;
>> @@ -677,8 +810,8 @@ static int __maybe_unused rockchip_thermal_resume(struct device *dev)
>>
>> thermal->chip->set_tshut_mode(id, thermal->regs,
>> thermal->tshut_mode);
>> - thermal->chip->set_tshut_temp(id, thermal->regs,
>> - thermal->tshut_temp);
>> + thermal->chip->set_tshut_value(id, thermal->regs,
>> + tshut_value);
>> }
>>
>> thermal->chip->control(thermal->regs, true);
>> --
>> 1.9.1
>>
> _______________________________________________
> Linux-rockchip mailing list
> Linux-rockchip at lists.infradead.org
> http://lists.infradead.org/mailman/listinfo/linux-rockchip
--
Thanks,
Caesar
More information about the linux-arm-kernel
mailing list