[PATCH v1 3/6] thermal: rockchip: Support the RK3368 SoCs in thermal driver

Eduardo Valentin edubezval at gmail.com
Tue Nov 3 09:48:31 PST 2015


Hello Caesar,

On Thu, Oct 29, 2015 at 03:14:15PM +0800, Caesar Wang wrote:
> The RK3368 SoCs support to 2 channel TS-ADC, the temperature criteria
> of each channel can be configurable.
> 
> The system has two Temperature Sensors, channel 0 is for CPU,
> and channel 1 is for GPU.

Please improve your patch description. I dont think this patch only
adds the support for RK3368.

I see, for example, at least two other (maybe dependencies of the
new chip support) changes:

- conversion function improvement
- tshut value/temperature configuration

Could you please split this patch in smaller changes?

> 
> Signed-off-by: Caesar Wang <wxt at rock-chips.com>
> 
> ---
> 
> Changes in v1:
> - As Dmitry comment, make the conversion table in as a parameter.
> 

Are you sure that this version implements this suggestion?


>  drivers/thermal/rockchip_thermal.c | 183 ++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++-----
>  1 file changed, 158 insertions(+), 25 deletions(-)
> 
> diff --git a/drivers/thermal/rockchip_thermal.c b/drivers/thermal/rockchip_thermal.c
> index f96c151..4748a8e 100644
> --- a/drivers/thermal/rockchip_thermal.c
> +++ b/drivers/thermal/rockchip_thermal.c
> @@ -1,6 +1,9 @@
>  /*
>   * Copyright (c) 2014, Fuzhou Rockchip Electronics Co., Ltd
>   *
> + * Copyright (c) 2015, Fuzhou Rockchip Electronics Co., Ltd
> + * Caesar Wang <wxt at rock-chips.com>
> + *
>   * This program is free software; you can redistribute it and/or modify it
>   * under the terms and conditions of the GNU General Public License,
>   * version 2, as published by the Free Software Foundation.
> @@ -75,8 +78,12 @@ struct rockchip_tsadc_chip {
>  
>  	/* Per-sensor methods */
>  	int (*get_temp)(int chn, void __iomem *reg, int *temp);
> -	void (*set_tshut_temp)(int chn, void __iomem *reg, long temp);
> +	void (*set_tshut_value)(int chn, void __iomem *reg, u32 value);

Do you have any explanation why do you need to change from temp to
value? Can you include this in your patch description?

>  	void (*set_tshut_mode)(int chn, void __iomem *reg, enum tshut_mode m);
> +
> +	/* Per-table methods */
> +	const struct tsadc_table *table;
> +	int table_num;
>  };
>  
>  struct rockchip_thermal_sensor {
> @@ -102,7 +109,7 @@ struct rockchip_thermal_data {
>  	enum tshut_polarity tshut_polarity;
>  };
>  
> -/* TSADC V2 Sensor info define: */
> +/* TSADC Sensor info define: */
>  #define TSADCV2_AUTO_CON			0x04
>  #define TSADCV2_INT_EN				0x08
>  #define TSADCV2_INT_PD				0x0c
> @@ -124,6 +131,8 @@ struct rockchip_thermal_data {
>  #define TSADCV2_INT_PD_CLEAR_MASK		~BIT(8)
>  
>  #define TSADCV2_DATA_MASK			0xfff
> +#define TSADCV3_DATA_MASK			0x3ff
> +
>  #define TSADCV2_HIGHT_INT_DEBOUNCE_COUNT	4
>  #define TSADCV2_HIGHT_TSHUT_DEBOUNCE_COUNT	4
>  #define TSADCV2_AUTO_PERIOD_TIME		250 /* msec */
> @@ -172,21 +181,62 @@ static const struct tsadc_table v2_code_table[] = {
>  	{3421, 125000},
>  };
>  
> -static u32 rk_tsadcv2_temp_to_code(long temp)
> +static const struct tsadc_table v3_code_table[] = {
> +	{0, -40000},
> +	{106, -40000},
> +	{108, -35000},
> +	{110, -30000},
> +	{112, -25000},
> +	{114, -20000},
> +	{116, -15000},
> +	{118, -10000},
> +	{120, -5000},
> +	{122, 0},
> +	{124, 5000},
> +	{126, 10000},
> +	{128, 15000},
> +	{130, 20000},
> +	{132, 25000},
> +	{134, 30000},
> +	{136, 35000},
> +	{138, 40000},
> +	{140, 45000},
> +	{142, 50000},
> +	{144, 55000},
> +	{146, 60000},
> +	{148, 65000},
> +	{150, 70000},
> +	{152, 75000},
> +	{154, 80000},
> +	{156, 85000},
> +	{158, 90000},
> +	{160, 95000},
> +	{162, 100000},
> +	{163, 105000},
> +	{165, 110000},
> +	{167, 115000},
> +	{169, 120000},
> +	{171, 125000},
> +	{TSADCV3_DATA_MASK, 125000},
> +};
> +
> +static u32 rk_tsadcv2_temp_to_code(const struct rockchip_tsadc_chip *chip,
> +				   long temp)
>  {

This function receives the chip structure as parameter...

> +	const struct tsadc_table *table = chip->table;
>  	int high, low, mid;
>  
>  	low = 0;
> -	high = ARRAY_SIZE(v2_code_table) - 1;
> +	high = chip->table_num - 1;
>  	mid = (high + low) / 2;
>  
> -	if (temp < v2_code_table[low].temp || temp > v2_code_table[high].temp)
> +	if (temp < table[low].temp || temp > table[high].temp)
>  		return 0;
>  
>  	while (low <= high) {
> -		if (temp == v2_code_table[mid].temp)
> -			return v2_code_table[mid].code;
> -		else if (temp < v2_code_table[mid].temp)
> +		if (temp == table[mid].temp)
> +			return table[mid].code;
> +		else if (temp < table[mid].temp)
>  			high = mid - 1;
>  		else
>  			low = mid + 1;

And seams to do the work.. but..

I am assuming you have forgotten to continue the change in the remaining
functions: rk_tsadcv2_code_to_temp:

215 
216         /*
217          * The 5C granularity provided by the table is too much. Let's
218          * assume that the relationship between sensor readings and
219          * temperature between 2 table entries is linear and interpolate
220          * to produce less granular result.
221          */
222         num = v2_code_table[mid].temp - v2_code_table[mid - 1].temp;
223         num *= v2_code_table[mid - 1].code - code;
224         denom = v2_code_table[mid - 1].code - v2_code_table[mid].code;
225         *temp = v2_code_table[mid - 1].temp + (num / denom);
226 


Please finish the change in rk_tsadcv2_code_to_temp, to use chip->table, and



> @@ -235,16 +285,59 @@ static int rk_tsadcv2_code_to_temp(u32 code, int *temp)
>  	return 0;
>  }
>  
> +static int rk_tsadcv3_code_to_temp(u32 code, int *temp)
> +{
> +	unsigned int low = 1;
> +	unsigned int high = ARRAY_SIZE(v3_code_table) - 1;
> +	unsigned int mid = (low + high) / 2;
> +	unsigned int num;
> +	unsigned long denom;
> +
> +	BUILD_BUG_ON(ARRAY_SIZE(v3_code_table) < 2);
> +
> +	code &= TSADCV3_DATA_MASK;
> +	if (code < v3_code_table[low].code)
> +		return -EAGAIN;		/* Incorrect reading */
> +
> +	while (low <= high) {
> +		if (code >= v3_code_table[mid - 1].code &&
> +		    code < v3_code_table[mid].code)
> +			break;
> +		else if (code > v3_code_table[mid].code)
> +			low = mid + 1;
> +		else
> +			high = mid - 1;
> +		mid = (low + high) / 2;
> +	}
> +
> +	/*
> +	 * The 5C granularity provided by the table is too much. Let's
> +	 * assume that the relationship between sensor readings and
> +	 * temperature between 2 table entries is linear and interpolate
> +	 * to produce less granular result.
> +	 */
> +	num = v3_code_table[mid].temp - v3_code_table[mid - 1].temp;
> +	num *= code - v3_code_table[mid - 1].code;
> +	denom = v3_code_table[mid].code - v3_code_table[mid - 1].code;
> +	*temp = v3_code_table[mid - 1].temp + (num / denom);
> +
> +	return 0;
> +}

Do not add the above function, as it is a code duplication of 
rk_tsadcv2_code_to_temp. The above function, functionality wise, the same
as rk_tsadcv2_code_to_temp, except that it uses a different table.

 The suggestion is to pass the table as parameter to rk_tsadcv2_code_to_temp,
 then just reuse rk_tsadcv2_code_to_temp in both cases.

Would that work for you?

> +
>  /**
> - * rk_tsadcv2_initialize - initialize TASDC Controller
> - * (1) Set TSADCV2_AUTO_PERIOD, configure the interleave between
> - * every two accessing of TSADC in normal operation.
> - * (2) Set TSADCV2_AUTO_PERIOD_HT, configure the interleave between
> - * every two accessing of TSADC after the temperature is higher
> - * than COM_SHUT or COM_INT.
> - * (3) Set TSADCV2_HIGH_INT_DEBOUNCE and TSADC_HIGHT_TSHUT_DEBOUNCE,
> - * if the temperature is higher than COMP_INT or COMP_SHUT for
> - * "debounce" times, TSADC controller will generate interrupt or TSHUT.
> + * rk_tsadcv2_initialize - initialize TASDC Controller.
> + *
> + * (1) Set TSADC_V2_AUTO_PERIOD:
> + *     Configure the interleave between every two accessing of
> + *     TSADC in normal operation.
> + *
> + * (2) Set TSADCV2_AUTO_PERIOD_HT:
> + *     Configure the interleave between every two accessing of
> + *     TSADC after the temperature is higher than COM_SHUT or COM_INT.
> + *
> + * (3) Set TSADCV2_HIGH_INT_DEBOUNCE and TSADC_HIGHT_TSHUT_DEBOUNCE:
> + *     If the temperature is higher than COMP_INT or COMP_SHUT for
> + *     "debounce" times, TSADC controller will generate interrupt or TSHUT.
>   */
>  static void rk_tsadcv2_initialize(void __iomem *regs,
>  				  enum tshut_polarity tshut_polarity)
> @@ -286,6 +379,15 @@ static void rk_tsadcv2_control(void __iomem *regs, bool enable)
>  	writel_relaxed(val, regs + TSADCV2_AUTO_CON);
>  }
>  
> +static int rk_tsadcv3_get_temp(int chn, void __iomem *regs, int *temp)
> +{
> +	u32 val;
> +
> +	val = readl_relaxed(regs + TSADCV2_DATA(chn));
> +
> +	return rk_tsadcv3_code_to_temp(val, temp);
> +}

Same suggestion here. This function looks exactly the same as rk_tsadcv2_get_temp. can you just pass the chip as parameter, then?

> +
>  static int rk_tsadcv2_get_temp(int chn, void __iomem *regs, int *temp)
>  {
>  	u32 val;
> @@ -295,12 +397,11 @@ static int rk_tsadcv2_get_temp(int chn, void __iomem *regs, int *temp)
>  	return rk_tsadcv2_code_to_temp(val, temp);
>  }
>  
> -static void rk_tsadcv2_tshut_temp(int chn, void __iomem *regs, long temp)
> +static void rk_tsadcv2_tshut_value(int chn, void __iomem *regs, u32 value)
>  {
> -	u32 tshut_value, val;
> +	u32 val;
>  
> -	tshut_value = rk_tsadcv2_temp_to_code(temp);
> -	writel_relaxed(tshut_value, regs + TSADCV2_COMP_SHUT(chn));
> +	writel_relaxed(value, regs + TSADCV2_COMP_SHUT(chn));
>  
>  	/* TSHUT will be valid */
>  	val = readl_relaxed(regs + TSADCV2_AUTO_CON);
> @@ -337,8 +438,31 @@ static const struct rockchip_tsadc_chip rk3288_tsadc_data = {
>  	.irq_ack = rk_tsadcv2_irq_ack,
>  	.control = rk_tsadcv2_control,
>  	.get_temp = rk_tsadcv2_get_temp,
> -	.set_tshut_temp = rk_tsadcv2_tshut_temp,
> +	.set_tshut_value = rk_tsadcv2_tshut_value,
> +	.set_tshut_mode = rk_tsadcv2_tshut_mode,
> +
> +	.table = v2_code_table,
> +	.table_num = ARRAY_SIZE(v2_code_table),
> +};
> +
> +static const struct rockchip_tsadc_chip rk3368_tsadc_data = {
> +	.chn_id[SENSOR_CPU] = 0, /* cpu sensor is channel 0 */
> +	.chn_id[SENSOR_GPU] = 1, /* gpu sensor is channel 1 */
> +	.chn_num = 2, /* two channels for tsadc */
> +
> +	.tshut_mode = TSHUT_MODE_GPIO, /* default TSHUT via GPIO give PMIC */
> +	.tshut_polarity = TSHUT_LOW_ACTIVE, /* default TSHUT LOW ACTIVE */
> +	.tshut_temp = 95000,
> +
> +	.initialize = rk_tsadcv2_initialize,
> +	.irq_ack = rk_tsadcv2_irq_ack,
> +	.control = rk_tsadcv2_control,
> +	.get_temp = rk_tsadcv3_get_temp,
> +	.set_tshut_value = rk_tsadcv2_tshut_value,
>  	.set_tshut_mode = rk_tsadcv2_tshut_mode,
> +
> +	.table = v3_code_table,
> +	.table_num = ARRAY_SIZE(v3_code_table),
>  };
>  
>  static const struct of_device_id of_rockchip_thermal_match[] = {
> @@ -346,6 +470,10 @@ static const struct of_device_id of_rockchip_thermal_match[] = {
>  		.compatible = "rockchip,rk3288-tsadc",
>  		.data = (void *)&rk3288_tsadc_data,
>  	},
> +	{
> +		.compatible = "rockchip,rk3368-tsadc",
> +		.data = (void *)&rk3368_tsadc_data,
> +	},
>  	{ /* end */ },
>  };
>  MODULE_DEVICE_TABLE(of, of_rockchip_thermal_match);
> @@ -458,8 +586,10 @@ rockchip_thermal_register_sensor(struct platform_device *pdev,
>  	const struct rockchip_tsadc_chip *tsadc = thermal->chip;
>  	int error;
>  
> +	u32 tshut_value = rk_tsadcv2_temp_to_code(tsadc, thermal->tshut_temp);
> +
>  	tsadc->set_tshut_mode(id, thermal->regs, thermal->tshut_mode);
> -	tsadc->set_tshut_temp(id, thermal->regs, thermal->tshut_temp);
> +	tsadc->set_tshut_value(id, thermal->regs, tshut_value);
>  
>  	sensor->thermal = thermal;
>  	sensor->id = id;
> @@ -660,6 +790,9 @@ static int __maybe_unused rockchip_thermal_resume(struct device *dev)
>  	int i;
>  	int error;
>  
> +	u32 tshut_value = rk_tsadcv2_temp_to_code(thermal->chip,
> +						  thermal->tshut_temp);
> +
>  	error = clk_enable(thermal->clk);
>  	if (error)
>  		return error;
> @@ -677,8 +810,8 @@ static int __maybe_unused rockchip_thermal_resume(struct device *dev)
>  
>  		thermal->chip->set_tshut_mode(id, thermal->regs,
>  					      thermal->tshut_mode);
> -		thermal->chip->set_tshut_temp(id, thermal->regs,
> -					      thermal->tshut_temp);
> +		thermal->chip->set_tshut_value(id, thermal->regs,
> +					       tshut_value);
>  	}
>  
>  	thermal->chip->control(thermal->regs, true);
> -- 
> 1.9.1
> 



More information about the linux-arm-kernel mailing list