[GIT PULL 2/2] omap1 sparse irq support for v4.2

[Tony Lindgren]

* Arnd Bergmann <arnd at arndb.de> [150521 08:41]:
> On Thursday 21 May 2015 07:58:41 Tony Lindgren wrote:
> > * Arnd Bergmann <arnd at arndb.de> [150521 05:13]:
> > > On Wednesday 20 May 2015 15:36:05 Tony Lindgren wrote:
> > > > Add support for CONFIG_SPARSE_IRQ for omap1. This takes us a bit closer
> > > > to making omap1 support multiarch. After this series we still need to
> > > > make omap1 use the common clock framework and fix up the drivers to not
> > > > rely on includes from mach and plat directories.
> > > > 
> > > > Note that this branch depends on a GPIO driver fix in v4.1-rc3
> > > > d2d05c65c40e ("gpio: omap: Fix regression for MPUIO interrupts").
> > > > 
> > > 
> > > I'm getting lots of build errors in linux-next, which I think are
> > > caused by this series.
> > 
> > Hmm is this with make randconfig?
> 
> Yes, all sorts of randconfig builds hit different parts here
> 
> > What's the Kconfig option enabling these errors?
> 
> From what I can tell, this is simply a result of enabling
> CONFIG_SPARSE_IRQ, which results in linux/irq.h no longer
> implicitly including  mach/hardware.h through mach/irqs.h.

Hmm not seeing that here, well at least not with what I've
tried so far.
 
> You should be able to see these errors by just enabling
> the respective drivers. The errors manifest as a long list
> of undefined symbols like
> 
> /git/arm-soc/arch/arm/mach-omap1/io.c:33:28: error: 'OMAP1_IO_OFFSET' undeclared here (not in a function)
> /git/arm-soc/arch/arm/mach-omap1/io.c:43:14: error: 'OMAP7XX_DSP_BASE' undeclared here (not in a function)
> /git/arm-soc/arch/arm/mach-omap1/serial.c:114:33: note: each undeclared identifier is reported only once for each function it appears in
> /git/arm-soc/arch/arm/mach-omap1/pm.c:217:23: error: 'ULPD_SOFT_DISABLE_REQ_REG' undeclared (first use in this function)
> /git/arm-soc/drivers/video/fbdev/omap/sossi.c:608:17: error: 'MOD_CONF_CTRL_1' undeclared (first use in this function)
> 
> Then again, it is possible that I only see the errors because of
> an interaction with another patch from my randconfig fixes
> series.

I think there's something like that going on.. Maybe you're
now enabling multiarch for omap1 in your branch?

Regards,

Tony