[PATCH 11/11] clocksource: efm32: Use CLOCK_EVT_FEAT_PERIODIC for defining features
Daniel Lezcano
daniel.lezcano at linaro.org
Mon Mar 30 13:17:13 PDT 2015
From: Viresh Kumar <viresh.kumar at linaro.org>
We have used CLOCK_EVT_MODE_PERIODIC instead of CLOCK_EVT_FEAT_PERIODIC while
defining features. Fix it.
Acked-by: Uwe Kleine-Koenig <u.kleine-koenig at pengutronix.de>
Signed-off-by: Viresh Kumar <viresh.kumar at linaro.org>
Signed-off-by: Daniel Lezcano <daniel.lezcano at linaro.org>
---
drivers/clocksource/time-efm32.c | 2 +-
1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 1 deletion(-)
diff --git a/drivers/clocksource/time-efm32.c b/drivers/clocksource/time-efm32.c
index ec57ba2..5b6e3d5 100644
--- a/drivers/clocksource/time-efm32.c
+++ b/drivers/clocksource/time-efm32.c
@@ -111,7 +111,7 @@ static irqreturn_t efm32_clock_event_handler(int irq, void *dev_id)
static struct efm32_clock_event_ddata clock_event_ddata = {
.evtdev = {
.name = "efm32 clockevent",
- .features = CLOCK_EVT_FEAT_ONESHOT | CLOCK_EVT_MODE_PERIODIC,
+ .features = CLOCK_EVT_FEAT_ONESHOT | CLOCK_EVT_FEAT_PERIODIC,
.set_mode = efm32_clock_event_set_mode,
.set_next_event = efm32_clock_event_set_next_event,
.rating = 200,
--
1.9.1
More information about the linux-arm-kernel
mailing list