[PATCH 0/3] Add DT support for netxbig LEDs

[Jason Cooper]

On Mon, Mar 30, 2015 at 03:29:41PM +0200, Gregory CLEMENT wrote:
> Hi Simon,
> [...]
> 
> >>> Hi Gregory, Andrew and Jason,
> >>>
> >>> This patch set seems stuck. I believe that Bryan is probably too busy to
> >>> handle it...
> >>>
> >>> Is that possible to merge it via the mvebu tree ? Since only some LaCie
> >>> boards are impacted, I think it could make sense.
> >>
> >> Hi Simon
> >>
> >> Hard one. I also have a driver stuck in led limbo.
> >>
> >> Last time we took a fix via mvebu, it all went messy at the last
> >> minute. We made it very clear to Bryon we planned to take a patch via
> >> mvebu, we had queued it via mvebu, we had sent a pull request to
> >> arm-soc, all with no reply from Bryon. Only at the last minute did he
> >> jump in, pull it himself and send it to Linus. That caused Olof all
> >> sorts of problems with his tree.
> > 
> > It's also good to keep in mind the workflow of driver maintainers who push
> > directly to Linus.  They send PRs during the merge window, and don't
> > necessarily spend too much time in -next.  Which means, if they have good
> > filters running on lkml, they just sit down a week or so before the merge
> > window and apply everything they have pending.
> > 
> > For those of us who are feeding arm-soc, and are accustomed to getting things
> > in early, this can be nerve-wracking.
> > 
> > Brian has demonstrated that he does pick things up and get them merged.  We
> > just need to make sure that what he picks up is well tested and reviewed when
> > he gets to it.  Since there won't be time for another revision before the merge
> > window.  But hey, that's what -rc's are for.  :-P
> > 
> 
> At least what I can do is creating a led branch and merged it in the mvebu/for-next
> branch. It will allow us to be more confident for the merge window.

How would we know when to remove it?  We have no reliable communication with Brian.

thx,

Jason.