[PATCH v4 2/5] ARM: dts: Prepare exynos5410-odroidxu device tree
Andreas Färber
afaerber at suse.de
Mon Mar 16 03:27:57 PDT 2015
Hi Javier,
Am 16.03.2015 um 08:56 schrieb Javier Martinez Canillas:
> On Sun, Mar 15, 2015 at 11:00 PM, Andreas Färber <afaerber at suse.de> wrote:
>> Derived from exynos5410-smdk5410.dts.
>>
>> Signed-off-by: Andreas Färber <afaerber at suse.de>
>> ---
>> v1 -> v2 -> v3: Unchanged
Forgot to update the in-patch changelogs: v4 is unchanged as well
>>
>> arch/arm/boot/dts/Makefile | 1 +
>> arch/arm/boot/dts/exynos5410-odroidxu.dts | 78 +++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++
>> 2 files changed, 79 insertions(+)
>> create mode 100644 arch/arm/boot/dts/exynos5410-odroidxu.dts
>>
>> diff --git a/arch/arm/boot/dts/Makefile b/arch/arm/boot/dts/Makefile
>> index a1c776b8dcec..b040737edcbc 100644
>> --- a/arch/arm/boot/dts/Makefile
>> +++ b/arch/arm/boot/dts/Makefile
>> @@ -103,6 +103,7 @@ dtb-$(CONFIG_ARCH_EXYNOS5) += \
>> exynos5250-snow.dtb \
>> exynos5250-spring.dtb \
>> exynos5260-xyref5260.dtb \
>> + exynos5410-odroidxu.dtb \
>> exynos5410-smdk5410.dtb \
>> exynos5420-arndale-octa.dtb \
>> exynos5420-peach-pit.dtb \
>> diff --git a/arch/arm/boot/dts/exynos5410-odroidxu.dts b/arch/arm/boot/dts/exynos5410-odroidxu.dts
>> new file mode 100644
>> index 000000000000..97310bb727e2
>> --- /dev/null
>> +++ b/arch/arm/boot/dts/exynos5410-odroidxu.dts
>> @@ -0,0 +1,78 @@
>> +/*
>> + * Hardkernel ODROID-XU device tree source
>> + *
>> + * Copyright (c) 2014 SUSE LINUX Products GmbH
>> + *
>> + * Based on exynos5410-smdk5410.dts:
>> + *
>> + * Copyright (c) 2013 Samsung Electronics Co., Ltd.
>> + * http://www.samsung.com
>> + *
>> + * This program is free software; you can redistribute it and/or modify
>> + * it under the terms of the GNU General Public License version 2 as
>> + * published by the Free Software Foundation.
>> +*/
>> +
>> +/dts-v1/;
>> +#include "exynos5410.dtsi"
>> +/ {
>> + model = "ODROID-XU based on EXYNOS5410";
>> + compatible = "hardkernel,odroid-xu", "samsung,exynos5410", "samsung,exynos5";
>> +
>> + memory {
>> + reg = <0x40000000 0x80000000>;
>> + };
>> +
>> + chosen {
>> + bootargs = "console=ttySAC2,115200";
>> + };
>> +
>
> After commit a208ffd251d0 ("of: Enable console on serial ports
> specified by /chosen/stdout-path") the kernel is able to know what
> serial console to use if the DT defined an stdout-path property so
> should be preferred instead of using a console= parameter.
>
> I'll post today a series to change that on all exynos5 boards so you
> can base on that.
Okay, if no one else does, I could update smdk5410 before splitting.
>> + fin_pll: xxti {
>> + compatible = "fixed-clock";
>> + clock-frequency = <24000000>;
>> + clock-output-names = "fin_pll";
>> + #clock-cells = <0>;
>> + };
>> +
>
> I think this should be defined in exynos5410.dtsi instead since is an
> IP block in the SoC and referenced in the .dts using a label to change
> the clock-frequency in the board.
I hope you understood that this is a literal copy of smdk5410, so I'm
not going to make random changes here. If the Samsung guys want to make
this change for smdk5410, then fine, but otherwise - like for Snow and
Spring - I want to keep the diff -u low between the two.
>> + firmware at 02037000 {
>> + compatible = "samsung,secure-firmware";
>> + reg = <0x02037000 0x1000>;
>> + };
>> +
>> +};
>> +
>> +&mmc_0 {
>> + status = "okay";
>> + num-slots = <1>;
>> + cap-mmc-highspeed;
>> + broken-cd;
>> + card-detect-delay = <200>;
>> + samsung,dw-mshc-ciu-div = <3>;
>> + samsung,dw-mshc-sdr-timing = <2 3>;
>> + samsung,dw-mshc-ddr-timing = <1 2>;
>> + bus-width = <8>;
>> +};
>> +
>> +&mmc_2 {
>> + status = "okay";
>> + num-slots = <1>;
>> + cap-sd-highspeed;
>> + card-detect-delay = <200>;
>> + samsung,dw-mshc-ciu-div = <3>;
>> + samsung,dw-mshc-sdr-timing = <2 3>;
>> + samsung,dw-mshc-ddr-timing = <1 2>;
>> + bus-width = <4>;
>> + disable-wp;
>> +};
>> +
>> +&uart0 {
>> + status = "okay";
>> +};
>> +
>> +&uart1 {
>> + status = "okay";
>> +};
>> +
>> +&uart2 {
>> + status = "okay";
>> +};
>> --
>
> With those two changes:
>
> Reviewed-by: Javier Martinez Canillas <javier.martinez at collabora.co.uk>
Thanks, first review after posting for the third time... ;)
Regards,
Andreas
--
SUSE Linux GmbH, Maxfeldstr. 5, 90409 Nürnberg, Germany
GF: Felix Imendörffer, Jane Smithard, Jennifer Guild, Dilip Upmanyu,
Graham Norton; HRB 21284 (AG Nürnberg)
More information about the linux-arm-kernel
mailing list