[PATCH 23/41] clocksource: sun4i: Migrate to new 'set-state' interface

Viresh Kumar viresh.kumar at linaro.org
Thu Jun 18 05:23:36 PDT 2015


On 18-06-15, 14:01, Maxime Ripard wrote:
> On Thu, Jun 18, 2015 at 04:24:37PM +0530, Viresh Kumar wrote:
> > +static int sun4i_clkevt_shutdown(struct clock_event_device *evt)
> >  {
> > -	switch (mode) {
> > -	case CLOCK_EVT_MODE_PERIODIC:
> > -		sun4i_clkevt_time_stop(0);
> > -		sun4i_clkevt_time_setup(0, ticks_per_jiffy);
> > -		sun4i_clkevt_time_start(0, true);
> > -		break;
> > -	case CLOCK_EVT_MODE_ONESHOT:
> > -		sun4i_clkevt_time_stop(0);
> > -		sun4i_clkevt_time_start(0, false);
> > -		break;
> > -	case CLOCK_EVT_MODE_UNUSED:
> > -	case CLOCK_EVT_MODE_SHUTDOWN:
> > -	default:
> > -		sun4i_clkevt_time_stop(0);
> > -		break;

Because sun4i_clkevt_time_stop() is getting called in default case, it
is getting called for tick-resume mode already with the old set_mode
interface.

> > +	.tick_resume = sun4i_clkevt_shutdown,
> 
> I'm not exactly sure of the context here, but I wouldn't expect a
> callback called tick_resume to stop a timer. Is this expected?

And so this patch carried the same logic here.

At suspend: clockevents core calls ->set_state_shutdown() and at
resume it calls ->tick_resume() followed by setting to the proper
mode, i.e. periodic or oneshot.

Many driver authors didn't knew about these details and so did
shutdown in resume path as well.

For me, you might not even need a tick_resume() at all, as your driver
would have already shutted down on suspend and is just required to be
put to the right mode again.

But, I didn't wanted to change the way things behaved until now. I can
add another patch to get things fixed separately if you want me to.

-- 
viresh



More information about the linux-arm-kernel mailing list