[PATCH 23/41] clocksource: sun4i: Migrate to new 'set-state' interface
Maxime Ripard
maxime.ripard at free-electrons.com
Thu Jun 18 05:01:05 PDT 2015
On Thu, Jun 18, 2015 at 04:24:37PM +0530, Viresh Kumar wrote:
> Migrate sun4i driver to the new 'set-state' interface provided by
> clockevents core, the earlier 'set-mode' interface is marked obsolete
> now.
>
> This also enables us to implement callbacks for new states of clockevent
> devices, for example: ONESHOT_STOPPED.
>
> Cc: Maxime Ripard <maxime.ripard at free-electrons.com>
> Signed-off-by: Viresh Kumar <viresh.kumar at linaro.org>
> ---
> drivers/clocksource/sun4i_timer.c | 41 +++++++++++++++++++++------------------
> 1 file changed, 22 insertions(+), 19 deletions(-)
>
> diff --git a/drivers/clocksource/sun4i_timer.c b/drivers/clocksource/sun4i_timer.c
> index 1928a8912584..6f3719d73390 100644
> --- a/drivers/clocksource/sun4i_timer.c
> +++ b/drivers/clocksource/sun4i_timer.c
> @@ -81,25 +81,25 @@ static void sun4i_clkevt_time_start(u8 timer, bool periodic)
> timer_base + TIMER_CTL_REG(timer));
> }
>
> -static void sun4i_clkevt_mode(enum clock_event_mode mode,
> - struct clock_event_device *clk)
> +static int sun4i_clkevt_shutdown(struct clock_event_device *evt)
> {
> - switch (mode) {
> - case CLOCK_EVT_MODE_PERIODIC:
> - sun4i_clkevt_time_stop(0);
> - sun4i_clkevt_time_setup(0, ticks_per_jiffy);
> - sun4i_clkevt_time_start(0, true);
> - break;
> - case CLOCK_EVT_MODE_ONESHOT:
> - sun4i_clkevt_time_stop(0);
> - sun4i_clkevt_time_start(0, false);
> - break;
> - case CLOCK_EVT_MODE_UNUSED:
> - case CLOCK_EVT_MODE_SHUTDOWN:
> - default:
> - sun4i_clkevt_time_stop(0);
> - break;
> - }
> + sun4i_clkevt_time_stop(0);
> + return 0;
> +}
> +
> +static int sun4i_clkevt_set_oneshot(struct clock_event_device *evt)
> +{
> + sun4i_clkevt_time_stop(0);
> + sun4i_clkevt_time_start(0, false);
> + return 0;
> +}
> +
> +static int sun4i_clkevt_set_periodic(struct clock_event_device *evt)
> +{
> + sun4i_clkevt_time_stop(0);
> + sun4i_clkevt_time_setup(0, ticks_per_jiffy);
> + sun4i_clkevt_time_start(0, true);
> + return 0;
> }
>
> static int sun4i_clkevt_next_event(unsigned long evt,
> @@ -116,7 +116,10 @@ static struct clock_event_device sun4i_clockevent = {
> .name = "sun4i_tick",
> .rating = 350,
> .features = CLOCK_EVT_FEAT_PERIODIC | CLOCK_EVT_FEAT_ONESHOT,
> - .set_mode = sun4i_clkevt_mode,
> + .set_state_shutdown = sun4i_clkevt_shutdown,
> + .set_state_periodic = sun4i_clkevt_set_periodic,
> + .set_state_oneshot = sun4i_clkevt_set_oneshot,
> + .tick_resume = sun4i_clkevt_shutdown,
I'm not exactly sure of the context here, but I wouldn't expect a
callback called tick_resume to stop a timer. Is this expected?
Maxime
--
Maxime Ripard, Free Electrons
Embedded Linux, Kernel and Android engineering
http://free-electrons.com
-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: signature.asc
Type: application/pgp-signature
Size: 819 bytes
Desc: Digital signature
URL: <http://lists.infradead.org/pipermail/linux-arm-kernel/attachments/20150618/8f4d71d0/attachment.sig>
More information about the linux-arm-kernel
mailing list