[PATCH v3 1/7] dt/bindings: Add binding for the Raspberry Pi clock provider
lee at kernel.org
Fri Jul 24 08:30:08 PDT 2015
On Tue, 07 Jul 2015, Eric Anholt wrote:
> Lee Jones <lee at kernel.org> writes:
> > If I were the Clock Maintainer, I would have probably missed this
> > patch. You _must_ intimate which subsystem you are submitting to.
> >> The hardware clocks are not controllable by the ARM, so we have to
> >> make requests to the firmware to do so from the VPU side. This will
> >> let us replace fixed clocks in our DT with actual clock control (and
> >> correct frequency information).
> >> v2: Include the dt-bindings header in this commit instead of the next
> >> one. Make the clock indices match the firmware clock IDs. Rename
> >> the binding's compat string. Move the firmware phandle to be
> >> under a vendor-specific namespace.
> >> Signed-off-by: Eric Anholt <eric at anholt.net>
> >> ---
> >> .../clock/raspberrypi,bcm2835-firmware-clocks.txt | 25 ++++++++++++++++++++++
> >> include/dt-bindings/clk/raspberrypi.h | 23 ++++++++++++++++++++
> >> 2 files changed, 48 insertions(+)
> >> create mode 100644 Documentation/devicetree/bindings/clock/raspberrypi,bcm2835-firmware-clocks.txt
> >> create mode 100644 include/dt-bindings/clk/raspberrypi.h
> >> diff --git a/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/clock/raspberrypi,bcm2835-firmware-clocks.txt b/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/clock/raspberrypi,bcm2835-firmware-clocks.txt
> >> new file mode 100644
> >> index 0000000..0972602
> >> --- /dev/null
> >> +++ b/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/clock/raspberrypi,bcm2835-firmware-clocks.txt
> >> @@ -0,0 +1,25 @@
> >> +Raspberry Pi firmware clock provider.
> >> +
> >> +The Raspberry Pi architecture doesn't provide direct access to the
> >> +CLOCKMAN peripheral from the ARM side, so Linux has to make requests
> >> +to the VPU firmware to program them.
> >> +
> >> +This binding uses the common clock binding:
> >> +Documentation/devicetree/bindings/clock/clock-bindings.txt
> >> +
> >> +Required properties:
> >> +- compatible: Should be "raspberrypi,bcm2835-firmware-clocks"
> >> +
> >> +- #clock-cells: Shall have value <1>. The permitted clock-specifier
> >> + values can be found in
> >> + include/dt-bindings/clk/raspberrypi.h.
> >> +
> >> +- raspberrypi,firmware: Phandle to the firmware driver node.
> > I think 'firmware' is a candidate for a generic phandle name.
> Stephen Warren asked in the last version that I change it from
> "firmware" to "raspberrypi,firmware", which made sense to me since we're
> not some core infrastructure using these references. Which should it
We tend to use vendor specific bindings when others are unlikely to
make use of them. I would have thought that different vendors would
also make use of a generic 'firmware' phandle. The final decision
would probably be taken by the DT guys.
More information about the linux-arm-kernel