[PATCH v2 1/2] input: touchscreen: pixcir_i2c_ts: Add support for optional wakeup interrupt
Vignesh R
vigneshr at ti.com
Tue Jul 21 22:24:25 PDT 2015
Hi Dmitry,
On 07/20/2015 11:54 AM, Dmitry Torokhov wrote:
> On Sun, Jul 19, 2015 at 11:09:30PM -0700, Tony Lindgren wrote:
>> * Vignesh R <vigneshr at ti.com> [150719 21:53]:
>>> @@ -445,6 +443,8 @@ static struct pixcir_ts_platform_data *pixcir_parse_dt(struct device *dev)
>>> dev_dbg(dev, "%s: x %d, y %d, gpio %d\n", __func__,
>>> pdata->x_max + 1, pdata->y_max + 1, pdata->gpio_attb);
>>>
>>> + pdata->wakeirq = of_irq_get_byname(dev->of_node, "wakeupirq");
>>> +
>>> return pdata;
>>
>> What about handling -EPROVE_DEFER here? At least pinctrl-single can be
>> be a loadable module for the dedicated wakeirqs.
>
> Right. I think we should only allow -ENODATA to continue and return
> error in all other cases.
-EINVAL will be returned if "interrupt-names" is not specified. I will
make execption for -ENODATA & -EINVAL, and return error in all other cases?
>
> Also, I think "irq" suffix on name is redundant.
Ok, will drop "irq" suffix:
+ interrupt-names = "tsc", "wakeup";
>
> Thanks.
>
--
Regards
Vignesh
More information about the linux-arm-kernel
mailing list