[PATCH v3 1/4] PCI: iproc: enable arm64 support for iProc PCIe

[Ray Jui]

On 7/21/2015 3:02 PM, Bjorn Helgaas wrote:
> On Tue, Jul 21, 2015 at 01:50:28PM -0700, Ray Jui wrote:
>>
>>
>> On 7/21/2015 1:30 PM, Bjorn Helgaas wrote:
>>> On Wed, Jul 15, 2015 at 09:39:20PM -0700, Ray Jui wrote:
>>>> This patch enables arm64 support to the iProc PCIe driver
>>>
>>> This needs a little more explanation: ARM has a common struct pci_sys_data
>>> but ARM64 does not,
>>
>> Correct, and according to Arnd, there's already work in process of
>> removing the need for pci_sys_data on arm32. Before that is done, we
>> need this in the driver for it to work on both arm32 and arm64.
>>
>> and ARM needs pci_fixup_irqs() but ARM64 does not (why
>>> not?),
>>
>> under arch/arm64/kernel/pci.c:
>>
>>  41 /*
>>  42  * Try to assign the IRQ number from DT when adding a new device
>>  43  */
>>  44 int pcibios_add_device(struct pci_dev *dev)
>>  45 {
>>  46         dev->irq = of_irq_parse_and_map_pci(dev, 0, 0);
>>  47
>>  48         return 0;
>>  49 }
>>
>> interrupt is automatically parsed and mapped when adding a new device
>> for arm64.
>>
>> ARM uses the common pci_sys_data for the PCI sysdata while ARM64
>>> uses a driver-specific sysdata, etc.
>>
>> Correct. pci_sys_data for arm32 will eventually be removed, so all arm32
>> based PCie host should only need to carry driver specific sysdata.
> 
> That all makes sense.  I'm just looking for a condensed version of it in
> the changelog because it takes some digging to figure it out, and in a
> couple months even the implicit context of "somebody's working to combine
> arm32 and arm64" will be gone.  So we need a changelog that motivates this
> patch as it is.
> 

Okay I will re-submit a new patch with a commit message that explains
the change in more details.

Thanks,

Ray