[PATCH v4 1/2] mfd: devicetree: add bindings for Atmel Flexcom
Lee Jones
lee.jones at linaro.org
Tue Jul 21 02:09:10 PDT 2015
On Mon, 22 Jun 2015, Cyrille Pitchen wrote:
> This patch documents the DT bindings for the Atmel Flexcom which will be
> introduced by sama5d2x SoCs. These bindings will be used by the actual Flexcom
> driver to be sent in another patch.
>
> Signed-off-by: Cyrille Pitchen <cyrille.pitchen at atmel.com>
> Acked-by: Boris Brezillon <boris.brezillon at free-electrons.com>
> Acked-by: Alexandre Belloni <alexandre.belloni at free-electrons.com>
> ---
> .../devicetree/bindings/mfd/atmel-flexcom.txt | 58 ++++++++++++++++++++++
> 1 file changed, 58 insertions(+)
> create mode 100644 Documentation/devicetree/bindings/mfd/atmel-flexcom.txt
>
> diff --git a/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/mfd/atmel-flexcom.txt b/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/mfd/atmel-flexcom.txt
> new file mode 100644
> index 0000000..38f0e43
> --- /dev/null
> +++ b/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/mfd/atmel-flexcom.txt
> @@ -0,0 +1,58 @@
> +* Device tree bindings for Atmel Flexcom (Flexible Serial Communication Unit)
> +
> +The Atmel Flexcom is just a wrapper which embeds a SPI controller, an I2C
> +controller and an USART. Only one function can be used at a time and is chosen
> +at boot time according to the device tree.
> +
> +Required properties:
> +- compatible: "atmel,sama5d2-flexcom"
> +- reg: shall be the offset/length value for Flexcom dedicated I/O registers
> + (without USART, TWI or SPI registers).
> +- clocks: shall be the Flexcom peripheral clock from PMC.
> +- #address-cells: should be <1>
> +- #size-cells: should be <1>
> +- ranges: one range for the full I/O register region (including USART, TWI and
> + SPI registers)
> +- atmel,flexcom-mode: shall be a string among { "spi", "usart", "i2c", "twi" }.
> + "i2c" and "twi" are synonymous.
Please use a numerical value instead. You can then define it in
include/dt-bindings/*
This is only required if you supply more than one child node. Is that
the plan? I ask because you only have one child node in the example
below.
This document is pretty hard to read. Please line everything up
nicely, so it's easy on the eye:
- compatible: "atmel,sama5d2-flexcom"
- reg: shall be the offset/length value for Flexcom dedicated I/O registers
(without USART, TWI or SPI registers).
- clocks: shall be the Flexcom peripheral clock from PMC.
- #address-cells: should be <1>
- #size-cells: should be <1>
- ranges: one range for the full I/O register region (including USART, TWI and
SPI registers)
- atmel,flexcom-mode: shall be a string among { "spi", "usart", "i2c", "twi" }.
"i2c" and "twi" are synonymous.
> +Required child:
> +a child device of type matching the "atmel,flexcom-mode" property.
> +The reg property of this child should be:
> +- <0x200 0x200> for USART
> +- <0x400 0x200> for SPI
> +- <0x600 0x200> for I2C
> +
> +The phandle provided by the clocks property of the child is the same as one for
> +the Flexcom parent.
> +Other properties remain unchanged. See documentation of the respective device.
Please point to the other documentation.
../uart/<blah>
../spi/<blah>
../i2c/<blah>
> +Example:
> +
> +flx0: flexcom at f8034000 {
What references this node? If nothing, then you can remove the label.
> + compatible = "atmel,sama5d2-flexcom";
> + reg = <0xf8034000 0x200>;
> + clocks = <&flx0_clk>;
> + #address-cells = <1>;
> + #size-cells = <1>;
> + ranges = <0x0 0xf8034000 0x800>;
> + atmel,flexcom-mode = "spi";
> +
> + spi at f8034400 {
> + compatible = "atmel,at91rm9200-spi";
> + reg = <0x400 0x200>;
> + interrupts = <19 IRQ_TYPE_LEVEL_HIGH 7>;
> + pinctrl-names = "default";
> + pinctrl-0 = <&pinctrl_flx0_ioset1>;
> + #address-cells = <1>;
> + #size-cells = <0>;
> + clocks = <&flx0_clk>;
> + clock-names = "spi_clk";
> + atmel,fifo-size = <32>;
> +
> + mtd_dataflash at 0 {
> + compatible = "atmel,at25f512b";
> + reg = <0>;
> + spi-max-frequency = <20000000>;
> + };
> + };
> +};
--
Lee Jones
Linaro STMicroelectronics Landing Team Lead
Linaro.org │ Open source software for ARM SoCs
Follow Linaro: Facebook | Twitter | Blog
More information about the linux-arm-kernel
mailing list