[PATCH 14/18] KVM: ARM64: Add reset and access handlers for PMUSERENR_EL0 register
Christoffer Dall
christoffer.dall at linaro.org
Fri Jul 17 08:01:53 PDT 2015
On Mon, Jul 06, 2015 at 10:17:44AM +0800, shannon.zhao at linaro.org wrote:
> From: Shannon Zhao <shannon.zhao at linaro.org>
>
> Since the reset value of PMUSERENR_EL0 is UNKNOWN, use reset_unknown for
> its reset handler. Add access handler which emulates writing and reading
> PMUSERENR_EL0 register.
>
> Signed-off-by: Shannon Zhao <shannon.zhao at linaro.org>
> ---
> arch/arm64/kvm/sys_regs.c | 15 ++++++++++++++-
> include/kvm/arm_pmu.h | 1 +
> 2 files changed, 15 insertions(+), 1 deletion(-)
>
> diff --git a/arch/arm64/kvm/sys_regs.c b/arch/arm64/kvm/sys_regs.c
> index ec80937..d5984d0 100644
> --- a/arch/arm64/kvm/sys_regs.c
> +++ b/arch/arm64/kvm/sys_regs.c
> @@ -522,6 +522,19 @@ static bool access_pmovsclr(struct kvm_vcpu *vcpu,
> return true;
> }
>
> +/* PMUSERENR_EL0 accessor. */
> +static bool access_pmuserenr(struct kvm_vcpu *vcpu,
> + const struct sys_reg_params *p,
> + const struct sys_reg_desc *r)
> +{
> + if (p->is_write)
> + vcpu->arch.pmu.user_enable |= *vcpu_reg(vcpu, p->Rt);
> + else
> + *vcpu_reg(vcpu, p->Rt) = vcpu->arch.pmu.user_enable;
> +
> + return true;
> +}
> +
> /* Silly macro to expand the DBG{BCR,BVR,WVR,WCR}n_EL1 registers in one go */
> #define DBG_BCR_BVR_WCR_WVR_EL1(n) \
> /* DBGBVRn_EL1 */ \
> @@ -746,7 +759,7 @@ static const struct sys_reg_desc sys_reg_descs[] = {
> access_pmxevcntr, reset_unknown, PMXEVCNTR_EL0 },
> /* PMUSERENR_EL0 */
> { Op0(0b11), Op1(0b011), CRn(0b1001), CRm(0b1110), Op2(0b000),
> - trap_raz_wi },
> + access_pmuserenr, reset_unknown, PMUSERENR_EL0 },
> /* PMOVSSET_EL0 */
> { Op0(0b11), Op1(0b011), CRn(0b1001), CRm(0b1110), Op2(0b011),
> access_pmovsset, reset_unknown, PMOVSSET_EL0 },
> diff --git a/include/kvm/arm_pmu.h b/include/kvm/arm_pmu.h
> index dee8356..4f3d8a6 100644
> --- a/include/kvm/arm_pmu.h
> +++ b/include/kvm/arm_pmu.h
> @@ -39,6 +39,7 @@ struct kvm_pmu {
> /* IRQ pending flag */
> bool irq_pending;
> struct irq_work irq_work;
> + u32 user_enable;
why not store this in PMUSERENR_EL0 and get VM migration of this state
included for free?
Also, I assume the functionality to respect these flags are implemented
in a later patch or simply not supported? It would have been good to
note this in the cover letter.
-Christoffer
> struct kvm_pmc pmc[ARMV8_MAX_COUNTERS];
> #endif
> };
> --
> 2.1.0
>
More information about the linux-arm-kernel
mailing list