[PATCH v2 2/4] mfd: max77686: Use a generic name for the PMIC node in the example

[Javier Martinez Canillas]

Hello Sergei,

On 07/17/2015 11:11 AM, Sergei Shtylyov wrote:
> Hello.
> 
> On 7/17/2015 9:29 AM, Javier Martinez Canillas wrote:
> 
>> The ePAR standard says that: "the name of a node should be somewhat
> 
>    ePAPR.
>

Thanks for pointing it out. I guess that Lee can fix the typo when applying?

>> generic, reflecting the function of the device and not its precise
>> programming model."
> 
>> So, change the max77686 binding document example to use a generic
>> node name instead of using the chip's name.
> 
>> Suggested-by: Sergei Shtylyov <sergei.shtylyov at cogentembedded.com>
>> Signed-off-by: Javier Martinez Canillas <javier at osg.samsung.com>
> 
> MBR, Sergei
> 

Best regards,
-- 
Javier Martinez Canillas
Open Source Group
Samsung Research America