[PATCH 1/2] ASoC: rockchip: Add machine driver for max98090 codec
Paul Bolle
pebolle at tiscali.nl
Thu Jul 16 01:05:44 PDT 2015
On wo, 2015-07-15 at 11:15 +0800, Xing Zheng wrote:
> --- /dev/null
> +++ b/sound/soc/rockchip/rockchip_max98090.c
> +#define DRV_NAME "rockchip-snd-max98090"
> +static const struct of_device_id rockchip_max98090_of_match[] = {
> + { .compatible = "rockchip,rockchip-audio-max98090", },
> + {},
> +};
> +
> +static struct platform_driver snd_rk_mc_driver = {
> + .probe = snd_rk_mc_probe,
> + .remove = snd_rk_mc_remove,
> + .driver = {
> + .name = DRV_NAME,
> + .owner = THIS_MODULE,
> + .pm = &snd_soc_pm_ops,
> + .of_match_table = rockchip_max98090_of_match,
> + },
> +};
> +
> +module_platform_driver(snd_rk_mc_driver);
Nit: empty line here.
> +MODULE_AUTHOR("jianqun <jay.xu at rock-chips.com>");
> +MODULE_DESCRIPTION("Rockchip max98090 machine ASoC driver");
> +MODULE_LICENSE("GPL v2");
> +MODULE_ALIAS("platform:" DRV_NAME);
This seems only useful if there's a corresponding struct
platform_device. Ie, a platform_device with a "rockchip-snd-max98090"
.name, which will trigger a "MODALIAS=platform:rockchip-snd-max98090"
uevent when it's created. But I couldn't find where such a
platform_device is created.
Did I miss something? Or is there another way this alias is useful here?
> +MODULE_DEVICE_TABLE(of, rockchip_max98090_of_match);
The common pattern is to put MODULE_DEVICE_TABLE() directly after the
table it exports.
Likewise for 2/2 (except the empty line nit, that is).
Thanks,
Paul Bolle
More information about the linux-arm-kernel
mailing list