[PATCH] PCI-iproc: Delete unnecessary checks before two function calls
Ray Jui
rjui at broadcom.com
Tue Jul 14 13:23:23 PDT 2015
Hi Bjorn,
On 7/14/2015 1:10 PM, Bjorn Helgaas wrote:
> On Sun, Jun 28, 2015 at 04:52:16PM +0200, SF Markus Elfring wrote:
>> From: Markus Elfring <elfring at users.sourceforge.net>
>> Date: Sun, 28 Jun 2015 16:42:04 +0200
>>
>> The functions phy_exit() and phy_power_off() test whether their argument
>> is NULL and then return immediately.
>> Thus the test around the calls is not needed.
>>
>> This issue was detected by using the Coccinelle software.
>>
>> Signed-off-by: Markus Elfring <elfring at users.sourceforge.net>
>
> I haven't seen a followup to Ray's review, but in the interest of making
> progress, I updated and applied the patch as appended. I also reviewed
> other phy_*() calls under drivers/pci, and they all look OK (with no
> unnecessary tests for NULL).
>
> This is on the pci/host-iproc branch for v4.3.
>
Hmmm....I searched my mailbox but cannot find an email with this patch
(while I remember I reviewed and commented on the initial version of
this patch). It must have gone into some sub-folder or deleted by me by
accident. My bad.
Nevertheless,the current patch looks good to me!
Thanks,
Ray
>> ---
>> drivers/pci/host/pcie-iproc.c | 7 ++-----
>> 1 file changed, 2 insertions(+), 5 deletions(-)
>>
>> diff --git a/drivers/pci/host/pcie-iproc.c b/drivers/pci/host/pcie-iproc.c
>> index d77481e..f875821 100644
>> --- a/drivers/pci/host/pcie-iproc.c
>> +++ b/drivers/pci/host/pcie-iproc.c
>> @@ -239,12 +239,9 @@ err_rm_root_bus:
>> pci_remove_root_bus(bus);
>>
>> err_power_off_phy:
>> - if (pcie->phy)
>> - phy_power_off(pcie->phy);
>> + phy_power_off(pcie->phy);
>> err_exit_phy:
>> - if (pcie->phy)
>> - phy_exit(pcie->phy);
>> -
>> + phy_exit(pcie->phy);
>> return ret;
>> }
>> EXPORT_SYMBOL(iproc_pcie_setup);
>> --
>> 2.4.4
>
> commit 55b5e16332eb9ffc1cbaf975585f4521417ab427
> Author: Markus Elfring <elfring at users.sourceforge.net>
> Date: Sun Jun 28 16:42:04 2015 +0200
>
> PCI: iproc: Delete unnecessary checks before phy calls
>
> The functions phy_exit() and phy_power_off() test whether their argument is
> NULL and then return immediately. Thus the test around the calls is not
> needed.
>
> This issue was detected by using the Coccinelle software.
>
> [bhelgaas: also phy_init() and phy_power_on(), as Ray Jui suggested]
> [bhelgaas: also remove tests in iproc_pcie_remove()]
> Signed-off-by: Markus Elfring <elfring at users.sourceforge.net>
> Signed-off-by: Bjorn Helgaas <bhelgaas at google.com>
>
> diff --git a/drivers/pci/host/pcie-iproc.c b/drivers/pci/host/pcie-iproc.c
> index d77481e..9a00dca 100644
> --- a/drivers/pci/host/pcie-iproc.c
> +++ b/drivers/pci/host/pcie-iproc.c
> @@ -191,19 +191,16 @@ int iproc_pcie_setup(struct iproc_pcie *pcie, struct list_head *res)
> if (!pcie || !pcie->dev || !pcie->base)
> return -EINVAL;
>
> - if (pcie->phy) {
> - ret = phy_init(pcie->phy);
> - if (ret) {
> - dev_err(pcie->dev, "unable to initialize PCIe PHY\n");
> - return ret;
> - }
> -
> - ret = phy_power_on(pcie->phy);
> - if (ret) {
> - dev_err(pcie->dev, "unable to power on PCIe PHY\n");
> - goto err_exit_phy;
> - }
> + ret = phy_init(pcie->phy);
> + if (ret) {
> + dev_err(pcie->dev, "unable to initialize PCIe PHY\n");
> + return ret;
> + }
>
> + ret = phy_power_on(pcie->phy);
> + if (ret) {
> + dev_err(pcie->dev, "unable to power on PCIe PHY\n");
> + goto err_exit_phy;
> }
>
> iproc_pcie_reset(pcie);
> @@ -239,12 +236,9 @@ err_rm_root_bus:
> pci_remove_root_bus(bus);
>
> err_power_off_phy:
> - if (pcie->phy)
> - phy_power_off(pcie->phy);
> + phy_power_off(pcie->phy);
> err_exit_phy:
> - if (pcie->phy)
> - phy_exit(pcie->phy);
> -
> + phy_exit(pcie->phy);
> return ret;
> }
> EXPORT_SYMBOL(iproc_pcie_setup);
> @@ -254,10 +248,8 @@ int iproc_pcie_remove(struct iproc_pcie *pcie)
> pci_stop_root_bus(pcie->root_bus);
> pci_remove_root_bus(pcie->root_bus);
>
> - if (pcie->phy) {
> - phy_power_off(pcie->phy);
> - phy_exit(pcie->phy);
> - }
> + phy_power_off(pcie->phy);
> + phy_exit(pcie->phy);
>
> return 0;
> }
>
More information about the linux-arm-kernel
mailing list