[RFC PATCH 14/15] regulator: pwm: implement ->enable(), ->disable() and ->is_enabled methods

Mark Brown broonie at kernel.org
Tue Jul 14 04:08:19 PDT 2015


On Tue, Jul 14, 2015 at 01:02:22PM +0200, Boris Brezillon wrote:
> Mark Brown <broonie at kernel.org> wrote:

> > On Wed, Jul 01, 2015 at 10:22:00AM +0200, Boris Brezillon wrote:
> > > Implement the ->enable(), ->disable() and ->is_enabled methods and remove
> > > the PWM call in ->set_voltage_sel().

> > This doesn't apply, please check and resend.

> This series was made on top of Linus' tree (4.2-rc1 IIRC) and patch 14
> and 15 were not meant to be applied without Thierry's approval (they
> depend on other changes in the PWM framework).
> I can rebase them on top of linux-next (or just on top of Linus'
> 4.2-rc2) if Thierry is okay with that, but I don't think rebasing them
> on your regulator's for-next branch is a good idea.

What is the dependency for the enable patch?
-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: signature.asc
Type: application/pgp-signature
Size: 473 bytes
Desc: Digital signature
URL: <http://lists.infradead.org/pipermail/linux-arm-kernel/attachments/20150714/257aec9f/attachment.sig>


More information about the linux-arm-kernel mailing list