[PATCH v2 08/10] arm64/debug: Add missing #include
Dave Martin
Dave.Martin at arm.com
Mon Jul 13 07:44:34 PDT 2015
On Mon, Jul 13, 2015 at 03:34:36PM +0100, Mark Rutland wrote:
> On Mon, Jul 13, 2015 at 02:25:55PM +0100, Dave P Martin wrote:
> > <asm/debug-monitors.h> relies on <asm/ptrace.h>, but doesn't
> > declare this dependency. This becomes a problem once
> > debug-monitors.h starts getting included all over the place to get
> > the BRK immedates.
>
> I take it that's for struct pt_regs down in the ifndef __ASSEMBLY__
> portion?
Yes ... I suppose I could move the #include in there, but it seems
hermless. I prefer to keep them together.
>
> >
> > This patch adds the missing #include.
> >
> > Signed-off-by: Dave Martin <Dave.Martin at arm.com>
> > ---
> > arch/arm64/include/asm/debug-monitors.h | 1 +
> > 1 file changed, 1 insertion(+)
> >
> > diff --git a/arch/arm64/include/asm/debug-monitors.h b/arch/arm64/include/asm/debug-monitors.h
> > index 6a17fb8..b5715cb 100644
> > --- a/arch/arm64/include/asm/debug-monitors.h
> > +++ b/arch/arm64/include/asm/debug-monitors.h
> > @@ -20,6 +20,7 @@
> >
> > #include <asm/esr.h>
> > #include <asm/insn.h>
> > +#include <asm/ptrace.h>
>
> We're also missing <linux/types.h> (for struct list_head, u8, and u32),
> and <linux/errno.h> (for ENODEV in the reinstall_suspended_bps stub).
> Would you be able to fold those in?
Sure, can do.
> With those:
>
> Acked-by: Mark Rutland <mark.rutland at arm.com>
Cheers
---Dave
>
> Mark.
>
> >
> > /* Low-level stepping controls. */
> > #define DBG_MDSCR_SS (1 << 0)
> > --
> > 1.7.10.4
> >
>
> _______________________________________________
> linux-arm-kernel mailing list
> linux-arm-kernel at lists.infradead.org
> http://lists.infradead.org/mailman/listinfo/linux-arm-kernel
More information about the linux-arm-kernel
mailing list