[PATCH v7 1/9] nvmem: Add a simple NVMEM framework for nvmem providers
Joe Perches
joe at perches.com
Fri Jul 10 03:29:05 PDT 2015
On Fri, 2015-07-10 at 10:44 +0100, Srinivas Kandagatla wrote:
> This patch adds just providers part of the framework just to enable easy
> review.
Trivial notes:
> diff --git a/drivers/nvmem/core.c b/drivers/nvmem/core.c
> +struct nvmem_device {
> + const char *name;
> + struct regmap *regmap;
[]
> +struct nvmem_cell {
> + const char *name;
> + int offset;
> + int bytes;
It'd be nicer to use consistent indentation for *name
in nvmem_cell
> +static ssize_t bin_attr_nvmem_read(struct file *filp, struct kobject *kobj,
> + struct bin_attribute *attr,
> + char *buf, loff_t pos, size_t count)
> +{
[]
> + count = count/nvmem->word_size * nvmem->word_size;
maybe rounddown() ?
> +static ssize_t bin_attr_nvmem_write(struct file *filp, struct kobject *kobj,
> + struct bin_attribute *attr,
> + char *buf, loff_t pos, size_t count)
> +{
> + count = count/nvmem->word_size * nvmem->word_size;
and rounddown() here too ?
> +static struct nvmem_device *of_nvmem_find(struct device_node *nvmem_np)
> +{
> + struct device *d;
> +
> + if (!nvmem_np)
> + return NULL;
> +
> + d = bus_find_device(&nvmem_bus_type, NULL, nvmem_np, of_nvmem_match);
> +
> + return d ? to_nvmem_device(d) : NULL;
> +}
Perhaps more common as
d = bus_find_device(&nvmem_bus_type, NULL, nvmem_np, of_nvmem_match);
if (!d)
return NULL;
return to_nvmem_device(d);
}
> +struct nvmem_device *nvmem_register(struct nvmem_config *config)
> +{
[]
> + nvmem->read_only = nvmem->dev.of_node ?
> + of_property_read_bool(nvmem->dev.of_node,
> + "read-only") :
> + config->read_only;
odd indentation.
Normally, "read-only" would be aligned with nvmem->dev.of_node,
> + dev_dbg(&nvmem->dev, "Registering nvmem device %s\n",
> + dev_name(&nvmem->dev));
Isn't this going to have duplicated dev_name prefix and postfix?
> + if (device_create_bin_file(&nvmem->dev,
> + nvmem->read_only ? &bin_attr_ro_nvmem :
> + &bin_attr_rw_nvmem))
> + dev_info(&nvmem->dev, "Failed to create sysfs binary file\n");
Is the KERN_LEVEL correct?
Maybe dev_err/notice/warn/dbg?
More information about the linux-arm-kernel
mailing list