[RFC 12/17] irq: bypass: Extend skeleton for ARM forwarding control
Paolo Bonzini
pbonzini at redhat.com
Thu Jul 2 06:40:47 PDT 2015
On 02/07/2015 15:17, Eric Auger wrote:
> - new fields are added on producer side: linux irq, vfio_device handle,
> active which reflects whether the source is active (at interrupt
> controller level or at VFIO level - automasked -) and finally an
> opaque pointer which will be used to point to the vfio_platform_device
> in this series.
Linux IRQ and active should be okay. As to the vfio_device handle, you
should link it from the vfio_platform_device instead. And for the
vfio_platform_device, you can link it from the vfio_platform_irq instead.
Once you've done this, embed the irq_bypass_producer struct in the
vfio_platform_irq struct; in the new kvm_arch_* functions, go back to
the vfio_platform_irq struct via container_of. From there you can
retrieve pointers to the vfio_platform_device and the vfio_device.
> - new fields on consumer side: the kvm handle, the gsi
You do not need to add these. Instead, add the kvm handle to irqfd
only. Like above, embed the irq_bypass_consumer struct in the irqfd
struct; in the new kvm_arch_* functions, go back to the
vfio_platform_irq struct via container_of.
Paolo
More information about the linux-arm-kernel
mailing list