[PATCH] ARM: fix vdsomunge not to depend on glibc specific error.h
Russell King - ARM Linux
linux at arm.linux.org.uk
Wed Jul 1 15:30:34 PDT 2015
On Wed, Jul 01, 2015 at 05:29:13PM -0500, Nathan Lynch wrote:
> On 07/01/2015 05:27 PM, Russell King - ARM Linux wrote:
> > On Tue, Jun 30, 2015 at 11:48:29AM +0100, Szabolcs Nagy wrote:
> >> @@ -82,11 +80,25 @@
> >> #define EF_ARM_ABI_FLOAT_HARD 0x400
> >> #endif
> >>
> >> +static int failed;
> >> +static const char *argv0;
> >> static const char *outfile;
> >>
> >> +static void fail(const char *fmt, ...)
> >> +{
> >> + va_list ap;
> >> +
> >> + failed = 1;
> >> + fprintf(stderr, "%s: ", argv0);
> >> + va_start(ap, fmt);
> >> + vfprintf(stderr, fmt, ap);
> >> + va_end(ap);
> >> + exit(EXIT_FAILURE);
> >
> > What purpose does "failed" serve? Reading through this patch, it
> > seems to be a write-only variable.
>
> It's checked in an atexit handler:
>
> static void cleanup(void)
> {
> - if (error_message_count > 0 && outfile != NULL)
> + if (failed && outfile != NULL)
> unlink(outfile);
> }
Thx, missed that.
--
FTTC broadband for 0.8mile line: currently at 10.5Mbps down 400kbps up
according to speedtest.net.
More information about the linux-arm-kernel
mailing list