[PATCH 05/10] KVM: arm/arm64: vgic: Relax vgic_can_sample_irq for edge IRQs

Christoffer Dall christoffer.dall at linaro.org
Wed Jul 1 04:58:20 PDT 2015

On Wed, Jul 01, 2015 at 10:17:52AM +0100, Marc Zyngier wrote:
> On 30/06/15 21:19, Christoffer Dall wrote:
> > On Mon, Jun 08, 2015 at 06:04:00PM +0100, Marc Zyngier wrote:
> >> We only set the irq_queued flag for level interrupts, meaning
> >> that "!vgic_irq_is_queued(vcpu, irq)" is a good enough predicate
> >> for all interrupts.
> >>
> >> This will allow us to inject edge HW interrupts, for which the
> >> state ACTIVE+PENDING is not allowed.
> > 
> > I don't understand this; ACTIVE+PENDING is allowed for edge interrupts.
> > Do you mean that if we set the HW bit in the LR, then we are linking to
> > an HW interrupt where we don't allow that to be ACTIVE+PENDING on the HW
> > GIC side?
> > 
> > Why is this relevant here?  I feel like I'm missing context.
> I've probably taken a shortcut here - bear with me while I'm trying to
> explain the issue.
> For HW interrupts, we shouldn't even try to use the state bits in the
> LR, because that state is contained in the physical distributor. Setting
> the HW bit really means "there is something going on at the distributor
> level, just go there".

ok, so by "HW interrupts" you mean virtual interrupts with the HW bit in
the LR set, correct?

> If we were to inject a ACTIVE+PENDING interrupt at the LR level, we'd
> basically loose the second interrupt because that state is simply not
> considered.

Huh?  Which second interrupt.  I looked at the spec and it says don't
use the state bits for HW interrupts, so isn't it simply not supported
to set these bits at all and that's it?

> So the trick we're using is to only inject the active interrupt, and
> prevent anything else from being injected until we can confirm that the
> active state has been cleared at the physical level.
> Does it make any sense?
Sort of, but what I don't understand now is how the guest ever sees the
interrupt then.  If we always inject the virtual interrupt by setting
the active state on the physical distributor, and we can't inject this
as active+pending, and the guest doesn't see the state in the LR, then
how does this ever raise a virtual interrupt and how does the guest see
an interrupt which is only PENDING so that it can ack it etc. etc.?

Maybe I don't fully understand how the HW bit works after all...


More information about the linux-arm-kernel mailing list