[PATCH v3 04/11] KVM: arm: common infrastructure for handling AArch32 CP14/CP15
Christoffer Dall
christoffer.dall at linaro.org
Wed Jul 1 02:00:36 PDT 2015
On Wed, Jul 01, 2015 at 03:09:35PM +0800, zichao wrote:
>
>
> On June 30, 2015 3:43:34 AM GMT+08:00, Christoffer Dall <christoffer.dall at linaro.org> wrote:
> >On Mon, Jun 22, 2015 at 06:41:27PM +0800, Zhichao Huang wrote:
> >> As we're about to trap a bunch of CP14 registers, let's rework
> >> the CP15 handling so it can be generalized and work with multiple
> >> tables.
> >>
> >> Signed-off-by: Zhichao Huang <zhichao.huang at linaro.org>
> >> ---
> >> arch/arm/kvm/coproc.c | 176
> >++++++++++++++++++++++++++---------------
> >> arch/arm/kvm/interrupts_head.S | 2 +-
> >> 2 files changed, 112 insertions(+), 66 deletions(-)
> >>
> >> diff --git a/arch/arm/kvm/coproc.c b/arch/arm/kvm/coproc.c
> >> index 9d283d9..d23395b 100644
> >> --- a/arch/arm/kvm/coproc.c
> >> +++ b/arch/arm/kvm/coproc.c
> >> @@ -375,6 +375,9 @@ static const struct coproc_reg cp15_regs[] = {
> >> { CRn(15), CRm( 0), Op1( 4), Op2( 0), is32, access_cbar},
> >> };
> >>
> >> +static const struct coproc_reg cp14_regs[] = {
> >> +};
> >> +
> >> /* Target specific emulation tables */
> >> static struct kvm_coproc_target_table
> >*target_tables[KVM_ARM_NUM_TARGETS];
> >>
> >> @@ -424,47 +427,75 @@ static const struct coproc_reg *find_reg(const
> >struct coproc_params *params,
> >> return NULL;
> >> }
> >>
> >> -static int emulate_cp15(struct kvm_vcpu *vcpu,
> >> - const struct coproc_params *params)
> >> +/*
> >> + * emulate_cp -- tries to match a cp14/cp15 access in a handling
> >table,
> >> + * and call the corresponding trap handler.
> >> + *
> >> + * @params: pointer to the descriptor of the access
> >> + * @table: array of trap descriptors
> >> + * @num: size of the trap descriptor array
> >> + *
> >> + * Return 0 if the access has been handled, and -1 if not.
> >> + */
> >> +static int emulate_cp(struct kvm_vcpu *vcpu,
> >> + const struct coproc_params *params,
> >> + const struct coproc_reg *table,
> >> + size_t num)
> >> {
> >> - size_t num;
> >> - const struct coproc_reg *table, *r;
> >> -
> >> - trace_kvm_emulate_cp15_imp(params->Op1, params->Rt1, params->CRn,
> >> - params->CRm, params->Op2, params->is_write);
> >> + const struct coproc_reg *r;
> >>
> >> - table = get_target_table(vcpu->arch.target, &num);
> >> + if (!table)
> >> + return -1; /* Not handled */
> >>
> >> - /* Search target-specific then generic table. */
> >> r = find_reg(params, table, num);
> >> - if (!r)
> >> - r = find_reg(params, cp15_regs, ARRAY_SIZE(cp15_regs));
> >>
> >> - if (likely(r)) {
> >> + if (r) {
> >> /* If we don't have an accessor, we should never get here! */
> >> BUG_ON(!r->access);
> >>
> >> if (likely(r->access(vcpu, params, r))) {
> >> /* Skip instruction, since it was emulated */
> >> kvm_skip_instr(vcpu, kvm_vcpu_trap_il_is32bit(vcpu));
> >> - return 1;
> >> }
> >> - /* If access function fails, it should complain. */
> >> - } else {
> >> - kvm_err("Unsupported guest CP15 access at: %08lx\n",
> >> - *vcpu_pc(vcpu));
> >> - print_cp_instr(params);
> >> +
> >> + /* Handled */
> >> + return 0;
> >> }
> >> +
> >> + /* Not handled */
> >> + return -1;
> >> +}
> >> +
> >> +static void unhandled_cp_access(struct kvm_vcpu *vcpu,
> >> + const struct coproc_params *params)
> >> +{
> >> + u8 hsr_ec = kvm_vcpu_trap_get_class(vcpu);
> >> + int cp;
> >> +
> >> + switch (hsr_ec) {
> >> + case HSR_EC_CP15_32:
> >> + case HSR_EC_CP15_64:
> >> + cp = 15;
> >> + break;
> >> + case HSR_EC_CP14_MR:
> >> + case HSR_EC_CP14_64:
> >> + cp = 14;
> >> + break;
> >> + default:
> >> + WARN_ON((cp = -1));
> >> + }
> >> +
> >> + kvm_err("Unsupported guest CP%d access at: %08lx\n",
> >> + cp, *vcpu_pc(vcpu));
> >> + print_cp_instr(params);
> >> kvm_inject_undefined(vcpu);
> >> - return 1;
> >> }
> >>
> >> -/**
> >> - * kvm_handle_cp15_64 -- handles a mrrc/mcrr trap on a guest CP15
> >access
> >> - * @vcpu: The VCPU pointer
> >> - * @run: The kvm_run struct
> >> - */
> >> -int kvm_handle_cp15_64(struct kvm_vcpu *vcpu, struct kvm_run *run)
> >> +int kvm_handle_cp_64(struct kvm_vcpu *vcpu,
> >> + const struct coproc_reg *global,
> >> + size_t nr_global,
> >> + const struct coproc_reg *target_specific,
> >> + size_t nr_specific)
> >> {
> >> struct coproc_params params;
> >>
> >> @@ -478,7 +509,13 @@ int kvm_handle_cp15_64(struct kvm_vcpu *vcpu,
> >struct kvm_run *run)
> >> params.Rt2 = (kvm_vcpu_get_hsr(vcpu) >> 10) & 0xf;
> >> params.CRm = 0;
> >>
> >> - return emulate_cp15(vcpu, ¶ms);
> >> + if (!emulate_cp(vcpu, ¶ms, target_specific, nr_specific))
> >> + return 1;
> >> + if (!emulate_cp(vcpu, ¶ms, global, nr_global))
> >> + return 1;
> >> +
> >> + unhandled_cp_access(vcpu, ¶ms);
> >> + return 1;
> >> }
> >>
> >> static void reset_coproc_regs(struct kvm_vcpu *vcpu,
> >> @@ -491,12 +528,11 @@ static void reset_coproc_regs(struct kvm_vcpu
> >*vcpu,
> >> table[i].reset(vcpu, &table[i]);
> >> }
> >>
> >> -/**
> >> - * kvm_handle_cp15_32 -- handles a mrc/mcr trap on a guest CP15
> >access
> >> - * @vcpu: The VCPU pointer
> >> - * @run: The kvm_run struct
> >> - */
> >> -int kvm_handle_cp15_32(struct kvm_vcpu *vcpu, struct kvm_run *run)
> >> +int kvm_handle_cp_32(struct kvm_vcpu *vcpu,
> >> + const struct coproc_reg *global,
> >> + size_t nr_global,
> >> + const struct coproc_reg *target_specific,
> >> + size_t nr_specific)
> >> {
> >> struct coproc_params params;
> >>
> >> @@ -510,33 +546,57 @@ int kvm_handle_cp15_32(struct kvm_vcpu *vcpu,
> >struct kvm_run *run)
> >> params.Op2 = (kvm_vcpu_get_hsr(vcpu) >> 17) & 0x7;
> >> params.Rt2 = 0;
> >>
> >> - return emulate_cp15(vcpu, ¶ms);
> >> + if (!emulate_cp(vcpu, ¶ms, target_specific, nr_specific))
> >> + return 1;
> >> + if (!emulate_cp(vcpu, ¶ms, global, nr_global))
> >> + return 1;
> >> +
> >> + unhandled_cp_access(vcpu, ¶ms);
> >> + return 1;
> >> }
> >>
> >> /**
> >> - * kvm_handle_cp14_64 -- handles a mrrc/mcrr trap on a guest CP14
> >access
> >> + * kvm_handle_cp15_64 -- handles a mrrc/mcrr trap on a guest CP15
> >access
> >> * @vcpu: The VCPU pointer
> >> * @run: The kvm_run struct
> >> */
> >> -int kvm_handle_cp14_64(struct kvm_vcpu *vcpu, struct kvm_run *run)
> >> +int kvm_handle_cp15_64(struct kvm_vcpu *vcpu, struct kvm_run *run)
> >> {
> >> - struct coproc_params params;
> >> + const struct coproc_reg *target_specific;
> >> + size_t num;
> >>
> >> - params.CRn = (kvm_vcpu_get_hsr(vcpu) >> 1) & 0xf;
> >> - params.Rt1 = (kvm_vcpu_get_hsr(vcpu) >> 5) & 0xf;
> >> - params.is_write = ((kvm_vcpu_get_hsr(vcpu) & 1) == 0);
> >> - params.is_64bit = true;
> >> + target_specific = get_target_table(vcpu->arch.target, &num);
> >> + return kvm_handle_cp_64(vcpu,
> >> + cp15_regs, ARRAY_SIZE(cp15_regs),
> >> + target_specific, num);
> >> +}
> >>
> >> - params.Op1 = (kvm_vcpu_get_hsr(vcpu) >> 16) & 0xf;
> >> - params.Op2 = 0;
> >> - params.Rt2 = (kvm_vcpu_get_hsr(vcpu) >> 10) & 0xf;
> >> - params.CRm = 0;
> >> +/**
> >> + * kvm_handle_cp15_32 -- handles a mrc/mcr trap on a guest CP15
> >access
> >> + * @vcpu: The VCPU pointer
> >> + * @run: The kvm_run struct
> >> + */
> >> +int kvm_handle_cp15_32(struct kvm_vcpu *vcpu, struct kvm_run *run)
> >> +{
> >> + const struct coproc_reg *target_specific;
> >> + size_t num;
> >>
> >> - (void)trap_raz_wi(vcpu, ¶ms, NULL);
> >> + target_specific = get_target_table(vcpu->arch.target, &num);
> >> + return kvm_handle_cp_32(vcpu,
> >> + cp15_regs, ARRAY_SIZE(cp15_regs),
> >> + target_specific, num);
> >> +}
> >>
> >> - /* handled */
> >> - kvm_skip_instr(vcpu, kvm_vcpu_trap_il_is32bit(vcpu));
> >> - return 1;
> >> +/**
> >> + * kvm_handle_cp14_64 -- handles a mrrc/mcrr trap on a guest CP14
> >access
> >> + * @vcpu: The VCPU pointer
> >> + * @run: The kvm_run struct
> >> + */
> >> +int kvm_handle_cp14_64(struct kvm_vcpu *vcpu, struct kvm_run *run)
> >> +{
> >> + return kvm_handle_cp_64(vcpu,
> >> + cp14_regs, ARRAY_SIZE(cp14_regs),
> >> + NULL, 0);
> >> }
> >>
> >> /**
> >> @@ -546,23 +606,9 @@ int kvm_handle_cp14_64(struct kvm_vcpu *vcpu,
> >struct kvm_run *run)
> >> */
> >> int kvm_handle_cp14_32(struct kvm_vcpu *vcpu, struct kvm_run *run)
> >> {
> >> - struct coproc_params params;
> >> -
> >> - params.CRm = (kvm_vcpu_get_hsr(vcpu) >> 1) & 0xf;
> >> - params.Rt1 = (kvm_vcpu_get_hsr(vcpu) >> 5) & 0xf;
> >> - params.is_write = ((kvm_vcpu_get_hsr(vcpu) & 1) == 0);
> >> - params.is_64bit = false;
> >> -
> >> - params.CRn = (kvm_vcpu_get_hsr(vcpu) >> 10) & 0xf;
> >> - params.Op1 = (kvm_vcpu_get_hsr(vcpu) >> 14) & 0x7;
> >> - params.Op2 = (kvm_vcpu_get_hsr(vcpu) >> 17) & 0x7;
> >> - params.Rt2 = 0;
> >> -
> >> - (void)trap_raz_wi(vcpu, ¶ms, NULL);
> >> -
> >> - /* handled */
> >> - kvm_skip_instr(vcpu, kvm_vcpu_trap_il_is32bit(vcpu));
> >> - return 1;
> >> + return kvm_handle_cp_32(vcpu,
> >> + cp14_regs, ARRAY_SIZE(cp14_regs),
> >> + NULL, 0);
> >> }
> >>
> >>
> >/******************************************************************************
> >> diff --git a/arch/arm/kvm/interrupts_head.S
> >b/arch/arm/kvm/interrupts_head.S
> >> index f85c447..a20b9ad 100644
> >> --- a/arch/arm/kvm/interrupts_head.S
> >> +++ b/arch/arm/kvm/interrupts_head.S
> >> @@ -618,7 +618,7 @@ ARM_BE8(rev r6, r6 )
> >> * (hardware reset value is 0) */
> >> .macro set_hdcr operation
> >> mrc p15, 4, r2, c1, c1, 1
> >> - ldr r3, =(HDCR_TPM|HDCR_TPMCR|HDCR_TDRA|HDCR_TDOSA|HDCR_TDA)
> >> + ldr r3, =(HDCR_TPM|HDCR_TPMCR)
> >
> >why do we stop trapping accesses here?
>
> Because we didn't finish our trap handlers yet, if we keep the trapping enable here, the vm would not run normally as we use unhandled_cp_access in the trap handlers instead of trap_raz_wi.
>
> I enable trapping until everything is ok, in the last patch [11/11].
>
ok, I see. Feels a bit quirky, but ok.
-Christoffer
More information about the linux-arm-kernel
mailing list