[PATCH v3 4/4] mmc: sdhci: host: add new f_sdh30

Vincent Yang vincent.yang.fujitsu at gmail.com
Fri Jan 16 09:09:54 PST 2015


2015-01-16 16:36 GMT+08:00 Ulf Hansson <ulf.hansson at linaro.org>:
> [...]
>
>>>> +       pm_runtime_set_active(&pdev->dev);
>>>> +       pm_runtime_enable(&pdev->dev);
>>>> +       ret = pm_runtime_get_sync(&pdev->dev);
>>>> +       if (ret < 0)
>>>> +               dev_err(dev, "Failed to pm_runtime_get_sync: %d\n", ret);
>>>
>>> As I stated earlier I think this is a strange behaviour of how to
>>> implement runtime PM support. Could you elaborate one more time why
>>> this actually is needed?
>>
>> Thanks for pointing out this.
>> We studied again and realized that this runtime PM support was only there for
>> powerdomain management, but we have not yet upstreamed the powerdomain
>> support. Thus we would like to remove it in next version.
>
> I am fine with you removing the runtime PM support in the next
> version. I also hope you to upstream the power domain support later
> on, that would be nice.
>
> A small note:
> From a driver perspective, you shall be able to implement runtime PM
> support even if you haven't upstreamed the power domain support yet.
> But, let's then deal with that as a separate patch later on.

Yes, I got it.
Thanks a lot for your review and comments!

Kind regards
Vincent

>
> Kind regards
> Uffe



More information about the linux-arm-kernel mailing list