[PATCH] genirq: better describe IRQF_NO_SUSPEND semantics
Rafael J. Wysocki
rjw at rjwysocki.net
Fri Feb 27 14:41:05 PST 2015
On Friday, February 27, 2015 03:08:10 PM Jonathan Corbet wrote:
> On Fri, 20 Feb 2015 14:53:46 +0000
> Mark Rutland <mark.rutland at arm.com> wrote:
>
> > This patch updates the documentation regarding IRQF_NO_SUSPEND to make
> > this caveat explicit, hopefully making future misuse rarer. Cleanup of
> > existing misuse will occur as part of later patch series.
>
> Applied (with Peter's ack) to the docs tree.
Well, I've applied it too in the meantime. :-)
Also I'll have more commits on top of it, so it's better if it goes through
my tree I think, if you don't mind.
Rafael
More information about the linux-arm-kernel
mailing list