[PATCH] genirq: better describe IRQF_NO_SUSPEND semantics

[Jonathan Corbet]

On Fri, 20 Feb 2015 14:53:46 +0000
Mark Rutland <mark.rutland at arm.com> wrote:

> This patch updates the documentation regarding IRQF_NO_SUSPEND to make
> this caveat explicit, hopefully making future misuse rarer. Cleanup of
> existing misuse will occur as part of later patch series.

Applied (with Peter's ack) to the docs tree.

Thanks,

jon