[PATCH] mmc: pwrseq_simple: Fix regression with optional GPIOs

[Tony Lindgren]

* Ulf Hansson <ulf.hansson at linaro.org> [151228 04:18]:
> On 18 December 2015 at 23:31, Tony Lindgren <tony at atomide.com> wrote:
> > * Ulf Hansson <ulf.hansson at linaro.org> [151218 14:20]:
> >> On 18 December 2015 at 17:14, Tony Lindgren <tony at atomide.com> wrote:
> >> > * Ulf Hansson <ulf.hansson at linaro.org> [151207 16:20]:
> >> >> +Linus
> >> >>
> >> >> On 7 December 2015 at 23:54, Tony Lindgren <tony at atomide.com> wrote:
> >> >> > Commit ce037275861e ("mmc: pwrseq_simple: use GPIO descriptors array API")
> >> >> > changed the handling MMC power sequence so GPIOs no longer are optional.
> >> >> >
> >> >> > This broke SDIO WLAN at least for omap5 that can't yet use the reset GPIOs
> >> >> > with pwrseq_simple as a wait is needed after enabling the SDIO device.
> >> >>
> >> >> Can you elaborate on this. Did it break omap5 or not? :-)
> >> >
> >> > Ulf, is this patch queued for v4.4 as a regression fix? I don't see it
> >> > in Linux next or mainline trees?
> >>
> >> Ohh, I guess there where some misunderstanding. I made a bunch of
> >> comments on your patch as well, so I have been expecting a new
> >> version.
> >
> > Well this $subject patch was intended as a regression fix for v4.4-rc cycle.
> > All the other things discussed are not fixes but new features instead.
> >
> >> Sorry if that was unclear!
> >
> > I think this patch should be still fine as is, care to take a look again?
> 
> No, the patch have issues that needs to be fixed.
> http://www.spinics.net/lists/linux-mmc/msg34399.html

Oh sorry, somehow I did not notice those comments earlier, will take a look.

Tony