[PATCH] tty/serial: samsung: Add earlycon support
tomasz.figa at gmail.com
Sun Sep 21 16:19:46 PDT 2014
On 22.09.2014 01:10, Alim Akhtar wrote:
>>> As you said there is no support for ioremap on ARM, so this is not
>>> tested on ARM.
>> Don't forget that this driver is primarily targeted for ARM platforms
>> (versus just one ARM64-based Exynos7), so either this feature should be
>> clearly added as ARM64-specific (and compiled in conditionally) or made
>> work for all supported platforms.
> Well, this will work on every platform which uses
> "samsung,exynos4210-uart" as a UART controller.
> Exynos7 also use same, there is nothing special about ARM64 bit here.
> please see.
> For "s3c24xx-uart", this has to be implemented separably as that is a
> bit different.
For this feature, they differ only in locations and lengths of
FIFO-related bit fields. We had this already implemented for all
hardware variants and so my recommendation to reuse that code.
>>>>> smh Use ARM semihosting calls for early console.
>>>>> earlyprintk= [X86,SH,BLACKFIN,ARM,M68k]
> Do you think something like below make sense here?
> +static void exynos4210_serial_console_putc(struct uart_port *port, int ch)
> + while (!(readl(port->membase + S3C2410_UFCON) & S3C2410_UFCON_FIFOMODE))
> + ;
Waiting in a loop for a software-writable FIFO mode enable bit doesn't
look reasonable to me. Probably a typo?
> + wr_regb(port, S3C2410_UTXH, ch);
> + while ((readl(port->membase + S3C2410_UFSTAT) & S5PV210_UFSTAT_TXFULL))
> + ;
I wonder if you need to wait for the character to be sent. If you ensure
before writing a character that there is no previous one in the buffer
or there is space in FIFO then I believe you should be fine.
> and call exynos4210_serial_console_putc() in samsung_early_write()?
> Anyway functions names need to be changes accordingly.
Yes, this is exactly what we had implemented in the patch I mentioned,
except that the putc function was generic for all hardware variants.
More information about the linux-arm-kernel