[PATCH] tty/serial: samsung: Add earlycon support
Alim Akhtar
alim.akhtar at gmail.com
Sun Sep 21 16:10:37 PDT 2014
Hi Tomasz,
On Sun, Sep 21, 2014 at 10:54 PM, Tomasz Figa <tomasz.figa at gmail.com> wrote:
> On 21.09.2014 16:36, Alim Akhtar wrote:
>> Hi Tomasz,
>> Thanks for your valuable feedback on this patch.
>
> You're welcome.
>
>>>> diff --git a/Documentation/kernel-parameters.txt b/Documentation/kernel-parameters.txt
>>>> index 5ae8608..e01c0e5 100644
>>>> --- a/Documentation/kernel-parameters.txt
>>>> +++ b/Documentation/kernel-parameters.txt
>>>> @@ -936,6 +936,12 @@ bytes respectively. Such letter suffixes can also be entirely omitted.
>>>> must already be setup and configured. Options are not
>>>> yet supported.
>>>>
>>>> + samsung,<addr>
>>>> + Start an early, polled-mode console on a samsung serial
>>>> + port at the specified address. The samsung serial port
>>>> + must already be setup and configured. Options are not
>>>> + yet supported.
>>>> +
>>>
>>> Couldn't you simply parse this from DT? I believe there is already code
>>> parsing stdout property in chosen node for earlycon purposes present in
>>> the kernel.
>>>
>>> Anyway, we already had a patch for this in our internal tree, but it
>>> wasn't submitted because there was no support for early ioremap on ARM
>>> at that time. I haven't been following it since then (and I'm no longer
>>> at Samsung; Marek might be able to take this topic), is it already
>>> available?
>> I am not sure what you have internally, any further suggestions on
>> this is most welcome.
>
> I believe Marek should be able to post our internal patch, so maybe you
> could reuse it and adapt for your needs.
>
>> As you said there is no support for ioremap on ARM, so this is not
>> tested on ARM.
>
> Don't forget that this driver is primarily targeted for ARM platforms
> (versus just one ARM64-based Exynos7), so either this feature should be
> clearly added as ARM64-specific (and compiled in conditionally) or made
> work for all supported platforms.
>
Well, this will work on every platform which uses
"samsung,exynos4210-uart" as a UART controller.
Exynos7 also use same, there is nothing special about ARM64 bit here.
please see[1].
For "s3c24xx-uart", this has to be implemented separably as that is a
bit different.
>>>
>>>> smh Use ARM semihosting calls for early console.
>>>>
>>>> earlyprintk= [X86,SH,BLACKFIN,ARM,M68k]
>>>> diff --git a/drivers/tty/serial/Kconfig b/drivers/tty/serial/Kconfig
>>>> index 249e340..9d42ac8 100644
>>>> --- a/drivers/tty/serial/Kconfig
>>>> +++ b/drivers/tty/serial/Kconfig
>>>> @@ -257,6 +257,7 @@ config SERIAL_SAMSUNG_CONSOLE
>>>> bool "Support for console on Samsung SoC serial port"
>>>> depends on SERIAL_SAMSUNG=y
>>>> select SERIAL_CORE_CONSOLE
>>>> + select SERIAL_EARLYCON
>>>> help
>>>> Allow selection of the S3C24XX on-board serial ports for use as
>>>> an virtual console.
>>>> diff --git a/drivers/tty/serial/samsung.c b/drivers/tty/serial/samsung.c
>>>> index c78f43a..f32e9c8 100644
>>>> --- a/drivers/tty/serial/samsung.c
>>>> +++ b/drivers/tty/serial/samsung.c
>>>> @@ -917,6 +917,7 @@ s3c24xx_serial_verify_port(struct uart_port *port, struct serial_struct *ser)
>>>> #ifdef CONFIG_SERIAL_SAMSUNG_CONSOLE
>>>>
>>>> static struct console s3c24xx_serial_console;
>>>> +static void s3c24xx_serial_console_putchar(struct uart_port *port, int ch);
>>>>
>>>> static int __init s3c24xx_serial_console_init(void)
>>>> {
>>>> @@ -926,6 +927,22 @@ static int __init s3c24xx_serial_console_init(void)
>>>> console_initcall(s3c24xx_serial_console_init);
>>>>
>>>> #define S3C24XX_SERIAL_CONSOLE &s3c24xx_serial_console
>>>> +static void samsung_early_write(struct console *con, const char *s, unsigned n)
>>>> +{
>>>> + struct earlycon_device *dev = con->data;
>>>> +
>>>> + uart_console_write(&dev->port, s, n, s3c24xx_serial_console_putchar);
>>>
>>> Hmm, I'm not sure how this is supposed to work before the driver is
>>> fully initialized.
>>>
>>> s3c24xx_serial_console_putchar() will call
>>> s3c24xx_serial_console_txrdy(), which in turn requires the port argument
>>> to be a pointer to the member of a s3c24xx_uart_port struct, with filled
>>> info pointer, which I believe is ready only after s3c24xx_serial_probe().
>>>
>> I see your point here, but I did not hit any error or any runtime
>> crash with this patch when test on ARM64. In order to keep my changes
>> minimal I tried to reused the code already there in this file and that
>> worked for me. The reason why this is working is, if you see
>> s3c24xx_serial_console_txdy(), _info_ pointer is used in a conditional
>> operator and not really involved in any manipulation.
>> I am not sure if compiler should have give some warnings or error here.
>>
>
> The info pointer is always used whenever FIFO mode is enabled at
> boot-up, which is often the case on many boards (and depends on
> firmware). So the fact that it worked for you was purely a coincidence
> due to your bootloader not using this mode. (Btw. it should be mentioned
> in patch description on what hardware it was tested.)
>
>> But certainly this is not the way this is suppose to work probably.
>> Let me avoid a call to s3c24xx_serial_console_putchar() in my next respin.
>> As this is a very early call and earlycon expect that port are already
>> initialized (by bootloader), I will write a new function to be used
>> instead of s3c24xx_serial_console_putchar() that will directly write
>> to the serial port.
>>
>
> The mentioned patch already has this implemented, including support for
> all hardware variants. I'd strongly suggest basing your work on top of that.
>
> Marek, could you post that patch as an RFC, so that Alim could continue
> his work?
>
Please CC me when you post that.
Tomasz/Marek,
Do you think something like below make sense here?
+static void exynos4210_serial_console_putc(struct uart_port *port, int ch)
+{
+ while (!(readl(port->membase + S3C2410_UFCON) & S3C2410_UFCON_FIFOMODE))
+ ;
+
+ wr_regb(port, S3C2410_UTXH, ch);
+
+ while ((readl(port->membase + S3C2410_UFSTAT) & S5PV210_UFSTAT_TXFULL))
+ ;
+}
and call exynos4210_serial_console_putc() in samsung_early_write()?
Anyway functions names need to be changes accordingly.
[1] http://www.spinics.net/lists/devicetree/msg49918.html
> Best regards,
> Tomasz
--
Regards,
Alim
More information about the linux-arm-kernel
mailing list