gcc 4.8.3 miscompiles drivers/net/ethernet/freescale/fec_main.c ?!

[David Jander]

(included Michael Olbrich in CC)...

On Wed, 10 Sep 2014 14:32:20 +0200
Mikael Pettersson <mikpelinux at gmail.com> wrote:

> David Jander writes:
>  > 
>  > Hi,
>  > 
>  > I am seeing a strange problem when building a recent kernel with
>  > gcc-4.8.3 for armv7-a that contains the following patch:
>  > 
>  > https://git.kernel.org/cgit/linux/kernel/git/torvalds/linux.git/commit?id=bfd4ecdd87d350e19457fe0d02fa1e046774c44e
>  > 
>  > Unfortunately I am not good enough at reading ARM assembly output from
>  > GCC to understand whats going wrong, so I am asking for help.
>  > 
>  > I started noticing ethernet packet loss on a i.MX6 board after upgrading
>  > the kernel from 3.16-rc-something to latest mainline. The problem is very
>  > easy to reproduce so I started git-bisecting. Git bisect gave me the
>  > above patch as the culprit, and indeed: Without the patch a flood-ping
>  > goes fine (just one dot on screen, no lost packets). I apply the patch
>  > and the dots start filling the screen instantly.
>  > 
>  > I am compiling the kernel using Pengutronix's OSELAS toolchain version
>  > 2013.12.1, which is based on linaro gcc-4.8.3 without any relevant patches
>  > AFAIK.
> 
> Linaro's toolchain is itself heavily modified compared to FSF gcc-4.8.3,
> so first please try a pure vanilla FSF gcc-4.8.3, and then a likewise
> vanilla gcc-4.9.1.  If those also cause the malfunction, then you have
> proof for a bug in upstream gcc (or possibly undefined code in the kernel),
> otherwise the bug is likely Linaro's.

Thanks. I will try to build gcc-4.8.3 from vanilla FSF sources and try to
reproduce the problem there. Do you think there is a chance this is still a
kernel bug?
I have assembly output of both working and broken cases (inlined and
non-inlined function). I can post them here or send to anyone who wants to
try to make sense of it....

>  > Compiling with -O2 breaks the code, while -Os seems to produce a correctly
>  > working kernel.
>  > 
>  > I decided to make changes to the code and see if I could find other ways
>  > to "fix" the problem, and I got the following result:
>  > 
>  > The above mentioned patch introduces the static function
>  > fec_enet_hwtstamp() near line 1068 of fec_main.c. If I make an exact copy
>  > of this function, where I only change the name (e.g. fec_enet_hwtstamp2),
>  > and change one of the two places this function is called to instead use
>  > the other name, GCC inlines both copies and the problem disappears!
>  > 
>  > Since I am not very good at GCC internals nor do I know this piece of
>  > code in fec_main.c very well, I am asking here for help in hunting down
>  > the real bug, which I suspect is in GCC... but I want to know for sure.
>  > 
>  > Best regards,
>  > 
>  > -- 
>  > David Jander
>  > Protonic Holland.

Best regards,

-- 
David Jander
Protonic Holland.