[PATCH v2 4/7] clk: sunxi: unify sun6i AHB1 clock with proper PLL6 pre-divider
Chen-Yu Tsai
wens at csie.org
Mon Oct 6 06:44:17 PDT 2014
On Mon, Oct 6, 2014 at 8:58 PM, Chen-Yu Tsai <wens at csie.org> wrote:
> On Tue, Sep 30, 2014 at 11:54 PM, Maxime Ripard
> <maxime.ripard at free-electrons.com> wrote:
>> On Sat, Sep 27, 2014 at 04:49:52PM +0800, Chen-Yu Tsai wrote:
>>> This patch unifies the sun6i AHB1 clock, originally supported
>>> with separate mux and divider clks. It also adds support for
>>> the pre-divider on the PLL6 input, thus allowing the clock to
>>> be muxed to PLL6 with proper clock rate calculation.
>>>
>>> Signed-off-by: Chen-Yu Tsai <wens at csie.org>
>>> ---
>>> Documentation/devicetree/bindings/clock/sunxi.txt | 2 +-
>>> drivers/clk/sunxi/clk-sunxi.c | 209 ++++++++++++++++++++++
>>> 2 files changed, 210 insertions(+), 1 deletion(-)
>>>
>>> diff --git a/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/clock/sunxi.txt b/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/clock/sunxi.txt
>>> index 0d84f4b..e862818 100644
>>> --- a/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/clock/sunxi.txt
>>> +++ b/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/clock/sunxi.txt
>>> @@ -23,7 +23,7 @@ Required properties:
>>> "allwinner,sun5i-a10s-ahb-gates-clk" - for the AHB gates on A10s
>>> "allwinner,sun7i-a20-ahb-gates-clk" - for the AHB gates on A20
>>> "allwinner,sun6i-a31-ar100-clk" - for the AR100 on A31
>>> - "allwinner,sun6i-a31-ahb1-mux-clk" - for the AHB1 multiplexer on A31
>>> + "allwinner,sun6i-a31-ahb1-clk" - for the AHB1 clock on A31
>>> "allwinner,sun6i-a31-ahb1-gates-clk" - for the AHB1 gates on A31
>>> "allwinner,sun8i-a23-ahb1-gates-clk" - for the AHB1 gates on A23
>>> "allwinner,sun4i-a10-apb0-clk" - for the APB0 clock
>>> diff --git a/drivers/clk/sunxi/clk-sunxi.c b/drivers/clk/sunxi/clk-sunxi.c
>>> index 9caebff..7151e2c 100644
>>> --- a/drivers/clk/sunxi/clk-sunxi.c
>>> +++ b/drivers/clk/sunxi/clk-sunxi.c
>>> @@ -19,6 +19,7 @@
>>> #include <linux/of.h>
>>> #include <linux/of_address.h>
>>> #include <linux/reset-controller.h>
>>> +#include <linux/log2.h>
>>>
>>> #include "clk-factors.h"
>>>
>>> @@ -1357,3 +1358,211 @@ static void __init sun6i_init_clocks(struct device_node *node)
>>> }
>>> CLK_OF_DECLARE(sun6i_a31_clk_init, "allwinner,sun6i-a31", sun6i_init_clocks);
>>> CLK_OF_DECLARE(sun8i_a23_clk_init, "allwinner,sun8i-a23", sun6i_init_clocks);
>>> +
>>> +
>>
>> Drop the extra newline
>
> OK.
>
>>> +/**
>>> + * sun6i_a31_ahb1_clk_setup() - Setup function for a31 ahb1 composite clk
>>> + */
>>> +
>>> +#define SUN6I_AHB1_MAX_PARENTS 4
>>> +#define SUN6I_AHB1_MUX_PARENT_PLL6 3
>>> +#define SUN6I_AHB1_MUX_SHIFT 12
>>> +#define SUN6I_AHB1_MUX_MASK 0x3
>>> +#define SUN6I_AHB1_MUX_GET_PARENT(reg) ((reg >> SUN6I_AHB1_MUX_SHIFT) & \
>>> + SUN6I_AHB1_MUX_MASK)
>>> +#define SUN6I_AHB1_DIV_SHIFT 4
>>> +#define SUN6I_AHB1_DIV_MASK 0x3
>>> +#define SUN6I_AHB1_DIV_GET(reg) ((reg >> SUN6I_AHB1_DIV_SHIFT) & \
>>> + SUN6I_AHB1_DIV_MASK)
>>> +#define SUN6I_AHB1_DIV_SET(reg, div) ((reg & ~(SUN6I_AHB1_DIV_MASK << \
>>> + SUN6I_AHB1_DIV_SHIFT)) | \
>>> + (div << SUN6I_AHB1_DIV_SHIFT))
>>> +#define SUN6I_AHB1_PLL6_DIV_SHIFT 6
>>> +#define SUN6I_AHB1_PLL6_DIV_MASK 0x3
>>> +#define SUN6I_AHB1_PLL6_DIV_GET(reg) ((reg >> SUN6I_AHB1_PLL6_DIV_SHIFT) & \
>>> + SUN6I_AHB1_PLL6_DIV_MASK)
>>> +#define SUN6I_AHB1_PLL6_DIV_SET(reg, div) ((reg & \
>>> + ~(SUN6I_AHB1_PLL6_DIV_MASK << \
>>> + SUN6I_AHB1_PLL6_DIV_SHIFT)) | \
>>> + (div << SUN6I_AHB1_PLL6_DIV_SHIFT))
>>
>> Your indentation looks really odd, and the masks you have should
>> really point to the actual mask, and not just the number of bits.
>
> It is an attempt to match open parenthesis. Guess that's not a good idea.
> Will switch to normal indentation. And fix the masks.
Just took a closer look at the code. The reason MUX_MASK is not shifted
is because clk_mux_ops expects them that way.
I could get rid of SUN6I_AHB1_MUX_GET_PARENT and call clk_mux_ops.get_parent,
but I don't think that's better.
*_DIV_MASK I will fix. Only issue is line length. :(
ChenYu
>>> +
>>> +struct sun6i_ahb1_clk {
>>> + struct clk_hw hw;
>>> + void __iomem *reg;
>>> +};
>>> +
>>> +#define to_sun6i_ahb1_clk(_hw) container_of(_hw, struct sun6i_ahb1_clk, hw)
>>> +
>>> +static unsigned long sun6i_ahb1_clk_recalc_rate(struct clk_hw *hw,
>>> + unsigned long parent_rate)
>>> +{
>>> + struct sun6i_ahb1_clk *ahb1 = to_sun6i_ahb1_clk(hw);
>>> + unsigned long rate;
>>> + u32 reg;
>>> +
>>> + /* Fetch the register value */
>>> + reg = readl(ahb1->reg);
>>> +
>>> + /* apply pre-divider first if parent is pll6 */
>>> + if (SUN6I_AHB1_MUX_GET_PARENT(reg) == SUN6I_AHB1_MUX_PARENT_PLL6)
>>> + parent_rate /= SUN6I_AHB1_PLL6_DIV_GET(reg) + 1;
>>> +
>>> + /* clk divider */
>>> + rate = parent_rate >> SUN6I_AHB1_DIV_GET(reg);
>>> +
>>> + return rate;
>>> +}
>>> +
>>> +static long sun6i_ahb1_clk_round(unsigned long rate, u8 *divp, u8 *pre_divp,
>>> + u8 parent, unsigned long parent_rate)
>>> +{
>>> + u8 div, calcp, calcm = 1;
>>> +
>>> + /* clock can only divide, so we will never be able to achieve
>>> + * frequencies higher than the parent frequency */
>>
>> Wrong multiline comment style
>
> I think I've done this twice already. This is from factors clk.
> I'll send a patch to fix the original.
>
>>> + if (parent_rate && rate > parent_rate)
>>> + rate = parent_rate;
>>> +
>>> + div = DIV_ROUND_UP(parent_rate, rate);
>>> +
>>> + /* calculate pre-divider if parent is pll6 */
>>> + if (parent == SUN6I_AHB1_MUX_PARENT_PLL6) {
>>> + if (div < 4)
>>> + calcp = 0;
>>> + else if (div / 2 < 4)
>>> + calcp = 1;
>>> + else if (div / 4 < 4)
>>> + calcp = 2;
>>> + else
>>> + calcp = 3;
>>> +
>>> + calcm = DIV_ROUND_UP(div, 1 << calcp);
>>> + } else {
>>> + calcp = __roundup_pow_of_two(div);
>>> + calcp = calcp > 3 ? 3 : calcp;
>>> + }
>>> +
>>> + if (divp) {
>>> + *divp = calcp;
>>> + *pre_divp = calcm - 1;
>>> + }
>>> +
>>> + return (parent_rate / calcm) >> calcp;
>>> +}
>>> +
>>> +static long sun6i_ahb1_clk_determine_rate(struct clk_hw *hw, unsigned long rate,
>>> + unsigned long *best_parent_rate,
>>> + struct clk **best_parent_clk)
>>> +{
>>> + struct clk *clk = hw->clk, *parent, *best_parent = NULL;
>>> + int i, num_parents;
>>> + unsigned long parent_rate, best = 0, child_rate, best_child_rate = 0;
>>> +
>>> + /* find the parent that can help provide the fastest rate <= rate */
>>> + num_parents = __clk_get_num_parents(clk);
>>> + for (i = 0; i < num_parents; i++) {
>>> + parent = clk_get_parent_by_index(clk, i);
>>> + if (!parent)
>>> + continue;
>>> + if (__clk_get_flags(clk) & CLK_SET_RATE_PARENT)
>>> + parent_rate = __clk_round_rate(parent, rate);
>>> + else
>>> + parent_rate = __clk_get_rate(parent);
>>> +
>>> + child_rate = sun6i_ahb1_clk_round(rate, NULL, NULL, i,
>>> + parent_rate);
>>> +
>>> + if (child_rate <= rate && child_rate > best_child_rate) {
>>> + best_parent = parent;
>>> + best = parent_rate;
>>> + best_child_rate = child_rate;
>>> + }
>>> + }
>>> +
>>> + if (best_parent)
>>> + *best_parent_clk = best_parent;
>>> + *best_parent_rate = best;
>>> +
>>> + return best_child_rate;
>>> +}
>>> +
>>> +static int sun6i_ahb1_clk_set_rate(struct clk_hw *hw, unsigned long rate,
>>> + unsigned long parent_rate)
>>> +{
>>> + struct sun6i_ahb1_clk *ahb1 = to_sun6i_ahb1_clk(hw);
>>> + unsigned long flags;
>>> + u8 div, pre_div, parent;
>>> + u32 reg;
>>> +
>>> + spin_lock_irqsave(&clk_lock, flags);
>>
>> Isn't that already taken by the composite clock?
>
> Last I checked, composite clock just calls the callbacks.
>
>>> +
>>> + reg = readl(ahb1->reg);
>>> +
>>> + /* need to know which parent is used to apply pre-divider */
>>> + parent = SUN6I_AHB1_MUX_GET_PARENT(reg);
>>> + sun6i_ahb1_clk_round(rate, &div, &pre_div, parent, parent_rate);
>>
>> Haven't you called that already in determine_rate?
>
> The call in determine_rate only returns a rounded clock rate.
> Here we actually get the divider values.
> I will add a comment in sun6i_ahb1_clk_round.
>
>>> +
>>> + reg = SUN6I_AHB1_DIV_SET(reg, div);
>>> + reg = SUN6I_AHB1_PLL6_DIV_SET(reg, pre_div);
>>> + writel(reg, ahb1->reg);
>>> +
>>> + spin_unlock_irqrestore(&clk_lock, flags);
>>> +
>>> + return 0;
>>> +}
>>> +
>>> +static const struct clk_ops sun6i_ahb1_clk_ops = {
>>> + .determine_rate = sun6i_ahb1_clk_determine_rate,
>>> + .recalc_rate = sun6i_ahb1_clk_recalc_rate,
>>> + .set_rate = sun6i_ahb1_clk_set_rate,
>>> +};
>>> +
>>> +static void __init sun6i_ahb1_clk_setup(struct device_node *node)
>>> +{
>>> + struct clk *clk;
>>> + struct sun6i_ahb1_clk *ahb1;
>>> + struct clk_mux *mux;
>>> + const char *clk_name = node->name;
>>> + const char *parents[SUN6I_AHB1_MAX_PARENTS];
>>> + void __iomem *reg;
>>> + int i = 0;
>>> +
>>> + reg = of_iomap(node, 0);
>>
>> of_io_request_and_map please :)
>
> This is new. Will switch. :)
>
>>> +
>>> + /* we have a mux, we will have >1 parents */
>>> + while (i < SUN6I_AHB1_MAX_PARENTS &&
>>> + (parents[i] = of_clk_get_parent_name(node, i)) != NULL)
>>> + i++;
>>> +
>>> + of_property_read_string(node, "clock-output-names", &clk_name);
>>> +
>>> + ahb1 = kzalloc(sizeof(struct sun6i_ahb1_clk), GFP_KERNEL);
>>> + if (!ahb1)
>>> + return;
>>> +
>>> + mux = kzalloc(sizeof(struct clk_mux), GFP_KERNEL);
>>> + if (!mux) {
>>> + kfree(ahb1);
>>> + return;
>>> + }
>>> +
>>> + /* set up clock properties */
>>> + mux->reg = reg;
>>> + mux->shift = SUN6I_AHB1_MUX_SHIFT;
>>> + mux->mask = SUN6I_AHB1_MUX_MASK;
>>> + mux->lock = &clk_lock;
>>> + ahb1->reg = reg;
>>> +
>>> + clk = clk_register_composite(NULL, clk_name, parents, i,
>>> + &mux->hw, &clk_mux_ops,
>>> + &ahb1->hw, &sun6i_ahb1_clk_ops,
>>> + NULL, NULL, 0);
>>> +
>>> + if (!IS_ERR(clk)) {
>>> + of_clk_add_provider(node, of_clk_src_simple_get, clk);
>>> + clk_register_clkdev(clk, clk_name, NULL);
>>> + }
>>> +}
>>> +
>>> +CLK_OF_DECLARE(sun6i_a31_ahb1, "allwinner,sun6i-a31-ahb1-clk",
>>> + sun6i_ahb1_clk_setup);
>>> --
>>> 2.1.1
>
> Thanks!
>
> ChenYu
More information about the linux-arm-kernel
mailing list