[PATCH v2 4/7] clk: sunxi: unify sun6i AHB1 clock with proper PLL6 pre-divider

Chen-Yu Tsai wens at csie.org
Mon Oct 6 05:58:25 PDT 2014


On Tue, Sep 30, 2014 at 11:54 PM, Maxime Ripard
<maxime.ripard at free-electrons.com> wrote:
> On Sat, Sep 27, 2014 at 04:49:52PM +0800, Chen-Yu Tsai wrote:
>> This patch unifies the sun6i AHB1 clock, originally supported
>> with separate mux and divider clks. It also adds support for
>> the pre-divider on the PLL6 input, thus allowing the clock to
>> be muxed to PLL6 with proper clock rate calculation.
>>
>> Signed-off-by: Chen-Yu Tsai <wens at csie.org>
>> ---
>>  Documentation/devicetree/bindings/clock/sunxi.txt |   2 +-
>>  drivers/clk/sunxi/clk-sunxi.c                     | 209 ++++++++++++++++++++++
>>  2 files changed, 210 insertions(+), 1 deletion(-)
>>
>> diff --git a/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/clock/sunxi.txt b/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/clock/sunxi.txt
>> index 0d84f4b..e862818 100644
>> --- a/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/clock/sunxi.txt
>> +++ b/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/clock/sunxi.txt
>> @@ -23,7 +23,7 @@ Required properties:
>>       "allwinner,sun5i-a10s-ahb-gates-clk" - for the AHB gates on A10s
>>       "allwinner,sun7i-a20-ahb-gates-clk" - for the AHB gates on A20
>>       "allwinner,sun6i-a31-ar100-clk" - for the AR100 on A31
>> -     "allwinner,sun6i-a31-ahb1-mux-clk" - for the AHB1 multiplexer on A31
>> +     "allwinner,sun6i-a31-ahb1-clk" - for the AHB1 clock on A31
>>       "allwinner,sun6i-a31-ahb1-gates-clk" - for the AHB1 gates on A31
>>       "allwinner,sun8i-a23-ahb1-gates-clk" - for the AHB1 gates on A23
>>       "allwinner,sun4i-a10-apb0-clk" - for the APB0 clock
>> diff --git a/drivers/clk/sunxi/clk-sunxi.c b/drivers/clk/sunxi/clk-sunxi.c
>> index 9caebff..7151e2c 100644
>> --- a/drivers/clk/sunxi/clk-sunxi.c
>> +++ b/drivers/clk/sunxi/clk-sunxi.c
>> @@ -19,6 +19,7 @@
>>  #include <linux/of.h>
>>  #include <linux/of_address.h>
>>  #include <linux/reset-controller.h>
>> +#include <linux/log2.h>
>>
>>  #include "clk-factors.h"
>>
>> @@ -1357,3 +1358,211 @@ static void __init sun6i_init_clocks(struct device_node *node)
>>  }
>>  CLK_OF_DECLARE(sun6i_a31_clk_init, "allwinner,sun6i-a31", sun6i_init_clocks);
>>  CLK_OF_DECLARE(sun8i_a23_clk_init, "allwinner,sun8i-a23", sun6i_init_clocks);
>> +
>> +
>
> Drop the extra newline

OK.

>> +/**
>> + * sun6i_a31_ahb1_clk_setup() - Setup function for a31 ahb1 composite clk
>> + */
>> +
>> +#define SUN6I_AHB1_MAX_PARENTS               4
>> +#define SUN6I_AHB1_MUX_PARENT_PLL6   3
>> +#define SUN6I_AHB1_MUX_SHIFT         12
>> +#define SUN6I_AHB1_MUX_MASK          0x3
>> +#define SUN6I_AHB1_MUX_GET_PARENT(reg)       ((reg >> SUN6I_AHB1_MUX_SHIFT) & \
>> +                                      SUN6I_AHB1_MUX_MASK)
>> +#define SUN6I_AHB1_DIV_SHIFT         4
>> +#define SUN6I_AHB1_DIV_MASK          0x3
>> +#define SUN6I_AHB1_DIV_GET(reg)              ((reg >> SUN6I_AHB1_DIV_SHIFT) & \
>> +                                      SUN6I_AHB1_DIV_MASK)
>> +#define SUN6I_AHB1_DIV_SET(reg, div) ((reg & ~(SUN6I_AHB1_DIV_MASK << \
>> +                                               SUN6I_AHB1_DIV_SHIFT)) | \
>> +                                      (div << SUN6I_AHB1_DIV_SHIFT))
>> +#define SUN6I_AHB1_PLL6_DIV_SHIFT    6
>> +#define SUN6I_AHB1_PLL6_DIV_MASK     0x3
>> +#define SUN6I_AHB1_PLL6_DIV_GET(reg) ((reg >> SUN6I_AHB1_PLL6_DIV_SHIFT) & \
>> +                                      SUN6I_AHB1_PLL6_DIV_MASK)
>> +#define SUN6I_AHB1_PLL6_DIV_SET(reg, div) ((reg & \
>> +                                         ~(SUN6I_AHB1_PLL6_DIV_MASK << \
>> +                                           SUN6I_AHB1_PLL6_DIV_SHIFT)) | \
>> +                                        (div << SUN6I_AHB1_PLL6_DIV_SHIFT))
>
> Your indentation looks really odd, and the masks you have should
> really point to the actual mask, and not just the number of bits.

It is an attempt to match open parenthesis. Guess that's not a good idea.
Will switch to normal indentation. And fix the masks.

>> +
>> +struct sun6i_ahb1_clk {
>> +     struct clk_hw hw;
>> +     void __iomem *reg;
>> +};
>> +
>> +#define to_sun6i_ahb1_clk(_hw) container_of(_hw, struct sun6i_ahb1_clk, hw)
>> +
>> +static unsigned long sun6i_ahb1_clk_recalc_rate(struct clk_hw *hw,
>> +                                             unsigned long parent_rate)
>> +{
>> +     struct sun6i_ahb1_clk *ahb1 = to_sun6i_ahb1_clk(hw);
>> +     unsigned long rate;
>> +     u32 reg;
>> +
>> +     /* Fetch the register value */
>> +     reg = readl(ahb1->reg);
>> +
>> +     /* apply pre-divider first if parent is pll6 */
>> +     if (SUN6I_AHB1_MUX_GET_PARENT(reg) == SUN6I_AHB1_MUX_PARENT_PLL6)
>> +             parent_rate /= SUN6I_AHB1_PLL6_DIV_GET(reg) + 1;
>> +
>> +     /* clk divider */
>> +     rate = parent_rate >> SUN6I_AHB1_DIV_GET(reg);
>> +
>> +     return rate;
>> +}
>> +
>> +static long sun6i_ahb1_clk_round(unsigned long rate, u8 *divp, u8 *pre_divp,
>> +                              u8 parent, unsigned long parent_rate)
>> +{
>> +     u8 div, calcp, calcm = 1;
>> +
>> +     /* clock can only divide, so we will never be able to achieve
>> +      * frequencies higher than the parent frequency */
>
> Wrong multiline comment style

I think I've done this twice already. This is from factors clk.
I'll send a patch to fix the original.

>> +     if (parent_rate && rate > parent_rate)
>> +             rate = parent_rate;
>> +
>> +     div = DIV_ROUND_UP(parent_rate, rate);
>> +
>> +     /* calculate pre-divider if parent is pll6 */
>> +     if (parent == SUN6I_AHB1_MUX_PARENT_PLL6) {
>> +             if (div < 4)
>> +                     calcp = 0;
>> +             else if (div / 2 < 4)
>> +                     calcp = 1;
>> +             else if (div / 4 < 4)
>> +                     calcp = 2;
>> +             else
>> +                     calcp = 3;
>> +
>> +             calcm = DIV_ROUND_UP(div, 1 << calcp);
>> +     } else {
>> +             calcp = __roundup_pow_of_two(div);
>> +             calcp = calcp > 3 ? 3 : calcp;
>> +     }
>> +
>> +     if (divp) {
>> +             *divp = calcp;
>> +             *pre_divp = calcm - 1;
>> +     }
>> +
>> +     return (parent_rate / calcm) >> calcp;
>> +}
>> +
>> +static long sun6i_ahb1_clk_determine_rate(struct clk_hw *hw, unsigned long rate,
>> +                                       unsigned long *best_parent_rate,
>> +                                       struct clk **best_parent_clk)
>> +{
>> +     struct clk *clk = hw->clk, *parent, *best_parent = NULL;
>> +     int i, num_parents;
>> +     unsigned long parent_rate, best = 0, child_rate, best_child_rate = 0;
>> +
>> +     /* find the parent that can help provide the fastest rate <= rate */
>> +     num_parents = __clk_get_num_parents(clk);
>> +     for (i = 0; i < num_parents; i++) {
>> +             parent = clk_get_parent_by_index(clk, i);
>> +             if (!parent)
>> +                     continue;
>> +             if (__clk_get_flags(clk) & CLK_SET_RATE_PARENT)
>> +                     parent_rate = __clk_round_rate(parent, rate);
>> +             else
>> +                     parent_rate = __clk_get_rate(parent);
>> +
>> +             child_rate = sun6i_ahb1_clk_round(rate, NULL, NULL, i,
>> +                                               parent_rate);
>> +
>> +             if (child_rate <= rate && child_rate > best_child_rate) {
>> +                     best_parent = parent;
>> +                     best = parent_rate;
>> +                     best_child_rate = child_rate;
>> +             }
>> +     }
>> +
>> +     if (best_parent)
>> +             *best_parent_clk = best_parent;
>> +     *best_parent_rate = best;
>> +
>> +     return best_child_rate;
>> +}
>> +
>> +static int sun6i_ahb1_clk_set_rate(struct clk_hw *hw, unsigned long rate,
>> +                                unsigned long parent_rate)
>> +{
>> +     struct sun6i_ahb1_clk *ahb1 = to_sun6i_ahb1_clk(hw);
>> +     unsigned long flags;
>> +     u8 div, pre_div, parent;
>> +     u32 reg;
>> +
>> +     spin_lock_irqsave(&clk_lock, flags);
>
> Isn't that already taken by the composite clock?

Last I checked, composite clock just calls the callbacks.

>> +
>> +     reg = readl(ahb1->reg);
>> +
>> +     /* need to know which parent is used to apply pre-divider */
>> +     parent = SUN6I_AHB1_MUX_GET_PARENT(reg);
>> +     sun6i_ahb1_clk_round(rate, &div, &pre_div, parent, parent_rate);
>
> Haven't you called that already in determine_rate?

The call in determine_rate only returns a rounded clock rate.
Here we actually get the divider values.
I will add a comment in sun6i_ahb1_clk_round.

>> +
>> +     reg = SUN6I_AHB1_DIV_SET(reg, div);
>> +     reg = SUN6I_AHB1_PLL6_DIV_SET(reg, pre_div);
>> +     writel(reg, ahb1->reg);
>> +
>> +     spin_unlock_irqrestore(&clk_lock, flags);
>> +
>> +     return 0;
>> +}
>> +
>> +static const struct clk_ops sun6i_ahb1_clk_ops = {
>> +     .determine_rate = sun6i_ahb1_clk_determine_rate,
>> +     .recalc_rate    = sun6i_ahb1_clk_recalc_rate,
>> +     .set_rate       = sun6i_ahb1_clk_set_rate,
>> +};
>> +
>> +static void __init sun6i_ahb1_clk_setup(struct device_node *node)
>> +{
>> +     struct clk *clk;
>> +     struct sun6i_ahb1_clk *ahb1;
>> +     struct clk_mux *mux;
>> +     const char *clk_name = node->name;
>> +     const char *parents[SUN6I_AHB1_MAX_PARENTS];
>> +     void __iomem *reg;
>> +     int i = 0;
>> +
>> +     reg = of_iomap(node, 0);
>
> of_io_request_and_map please :)

This is new. Will switch. :)

>> +
>> +     /* we have a mux, we will have >1 parents */
>> +     while (i < SUN6I_AHB1_MAX_PARENTS &&
>> +            (parents[i] = of_clk_get_parent_name(node, i)) != NULL)
>> +             i++;
>> +
>> +     of_property_read_string(node, "clock-output-names", &clk_name);
>> +
>> +     ahb1 = kzalloc(sizeof(struct sun6i_ahb1_clk), GFP_KERNEL);
>> +     if (!ahb1)
>> +             return;
>> +
>> +     mux = kzalloc(sizeof(struct clk_mux), GFP_KERNEL);
>> +     if (!mux) {
>> +             kfree(ahb1);
>> +             return;
>> +     }
>> +
>> +     /* set up clock properties */
>> +     mux->reg = reg;
>> +     mux->shift = SUN6I_AHB1_MUX_SHIFT;
>> +     mux->mask = SUN6I_AHB1_MUX_MASK;
>> +     mux->lock = &clk_lock;
>> +     ahb1->reg = reg;
>> +
>> +     clk = clk_register_composite(NULL, clk_name, parents, i,
>> +                                  &mux->hw, &clk_mux_ops,
>> +                                  &ahb1->hw, &sun6i_ahb1_clk_ops,
>> +                                  NULL, NULL, 0);
>> +
>> +     if (!IS_ERR(clk)) {
>> +             of_clk_add_provider(node, of_clk_src_simple_get, clk);
>> +             clk_register_clkdev(clk, clk_name, NULL);
>> +     }
>> +}
>> +
>> +CLK_OF_DECLARE(sun6i_a31_ahb1, "allwinner,sun6i-a31-ahb1-clk",
>> +             sun6i_ahb1_clk_setup);
>> --
>> 2.1.1

Thanks!

ChenYu



More information about the linux-arm-kernel mailing list