RFC: representing sdio devices oob interrupt, clks, etc. in device tree

Hans de Goede hdegoede at redhat.com
Fri May 23 06:28:05 PDT 2014


Hi,

On 05/23/2014 03:21 PM, Arend van Spriel wrote:
> On 05/23/14 13:50, Hans de Goede wrote:
>> Hi,
>>
>> On 05/23/2014 01:22 PM, Mark Brown wrote:
>>> On Fri, May 23, 2014 at 11:13:44AM +0200, Hans de Goede wrote:
>>>
>>>> Thinking more about this, I would like to make one change to my
>>>> proposal, the mmc-core should only do power up of child-nodes if
>>>> they have a compatible of: "simple-sdio-powerup". This way
>>>> when we add something more complex, we can keep the simple powerup
>>>> code in the mmc core, keeping what we've already using this working
>>>> and the mmc core won't respond to the child nodes for more complex
>>>> devices, so it won't conflict with more complex power-up handling
>>>> handled by some other driver.
>>>
>>> Would it not be better to have this be something in the driver struct
>>> rather than in the device tree?  Putting a compatible in there would be
>>> encoding details of the Linux implementation in the DT which doesn't
>>> seem right especially since these are details we're thinking of changing
>>> later on.
>>
>> The compatible is not a Linux specific thing, it is a marking saying
>> that something needs to take care of enabling the clks (and whatever
>> else we will make part of the binding for this compatible), before
>> scanning the mmc bus.
>>
>>> Something like have the driver set flags saying if it wants
>>> to do complicated things.
>>
>> Chicken<->  egg, we won't know which driver to use before we've probed
>> the mmc bus, and we cannot probe the bus before enabling the clks, etc.
> 
> The approach I took with brcmfmac is that upon module init I search the DT for "brcm,bcm43xx-fmac" compatible and get the clock and/or gpio resource and enable them before registering the sdio driver. The difficulty is probably when using the driver built-in as the clocks and gpios may not be available yet and we can not rely on deferred probing in module init stage.

I know, and that approach does not work, by the time the brcmfmac loads,
the mmc core has long probed the mmc bus and decided no one is home.

Regards,

Hans




More information about the linux-arm-kernel mailing list