Re: [RFC PATCH 2/9] dt: deps: dependency based device creation
shc_work at mail.ru
Fri May 16 10:31:20 PDT 2014
Wed, 14 May 2014 23:10:39 +0200 от Alexander Holler <holler at ahsoftware.de>:
> Am 14.05.2014 22:06, schrieb Grant Likely:
> > On Wed, 14 May 2014 16:49:05 +0200, Alexander Holler <holler at ahsoftware.de> wrote:
> >> Am 14.05.2014 16:05, schrieb Grant Likely:
> >>> On Mon, 12 May 2014 18:47:53 +0200, Alexander Holler <holler at ahsoftware.de> wrote:
> >> Hmm, I don't really care if that will be merged. I have no motivation to
> >> fight with Linux kernel maintainers and I don't know if I will spend the
> >> necessary time to do so.
> > The people you need to convince are Rob, Greg, and me, and you've got my
> > attention. If I'm convinced, then I can probably convince Greg also.
> > You've got an interesting approach, and I hope you won't give up on it.
> Sorry, but that point of the view is already a problem. Why do I have to
> convince you people?
> To summarize:
> Linux kernel maintainers
> - don't like code they haven't written theirself,
> - don't like code which doesn't look like they have written it theirself,
> - don't like ideas they haven't had themself,
> - do feel good in their closed group they have formed,
Very correct and well said.
For many subsystems is it as is, we cannot break these barriers.
More information about the linux-arm-kernel