[PATCH 1/5] ARM: smp_scu: Used defined value instead of literal constant
Gregory CLEMENT
gregory.clement at free-electrons.com
Thu Jun 26 15:55:47 PDT 2014
On 27/06/2014 00:43, Gregory CLEMENT wrote:
> The first bit of the SCU control register is actually the enable
> it. So let's name it instead of using literal constant.
>
> Signed-off-by: Gregory CLEMENT <gregory.clement at free-electrons.com>
> ---
> arch/arm/kernel/smp_scu.c | 10 ++++++----
> 1 file changed, 6 insertions(+), 4 deletions(-)
>
> diff --git a/arch/arm/kernel/smp_scu.c b/arch/arm/kernel/smp_scu.c
> index 1aafa0d785eb..cfea41b41ad0 100644
> --- a/arch/arm/kernel/smp_scu.c
> +++ b/arch/arm/kernel/smp_scu.c
> @@ -17,6 +17,7 @@
> #include <asm/cputype.h>
>
> #define SCU_CTRL 0x00
> +#define SCU_CTRL_ENABLE BIT(1)
As Ezequiel rightly pointed it to me, this line is obviously wrong!
it should be
+#define SCU_CTRL_ENABLE BIT(0)
> #define SCU_CONFIG 0x04
> #define SCU_CPU_STATUS 0x08
> #define SCU_INVALIDATE 0x0c
> @@ -43,17 +44,18 @@ void scu_enable(void __iomem *scu_base)
> /* Cortex-A9 only */
> if ((read_cpuid_id() & 0xff0ffff0) == 0x410fc090) {
> scu_ctrl = readl_relaxed(scu_base + 0x30);
> - if (!(scu_ctrl & 1))
> - writel_relaxed(scu_ctrl | 0x1, scu_base + 0x30);
> + if (!(scu_ctrl & SCU_CTRL_ENABLE))
> + writel_relaxed(scu_ctrl | SCU_CTRL_ENABLE,
> + scu_base + 0x30);
> }
> #endif
>
> scu_ctrl = readl_relaxed(scu_base + SCU_CTRL);
> /* already enabled? */
> - if (scu_ctrl & 1)
> + if (scu_ctrl & SCU_CTRL_ENABLE)
> return;
>
> - scu_ctrl |= 1;
> + scu_ctrl |= SCU_CTRL_ENABLE;
> writel_relaxed(scu_ctrl, scu_base + SCU_CTRL);
>
> /*
>
--
Gregory Clement, Free Electrons
Kernel, drivers, real-time and embedded Linux
development, consulting, training and support.
http://free-electrons.com
More information about the linux-arm-kernel
mailing list