[PATCH 1/5] ARM: smp_scu: Used defined value instead of literal constant

Gregory CLEMENT gregory.clement at free-electrons.com
Thu Jun 26 15:43:24 PDT 2014


The first bit of the SCU control register is actually the enable
it. So let's name it instead of using literal constant.

Signed-off-by: Gregory CLEMENT <gregory.clement at free-electrons.com>
---
 arch/arm/kernel/smp_scu.c | 10 ++++++----
 1 file changed, 6 insertions(+), 4 deletions(-)

diff --git a/arch/arm/kernel/smp_scu.c b/arch/arm/kernel/smp_scu.c
index 1aafa0d785eb..cfea41b41ad0 100644
--- a/arch/arm/kernel/smp_scu.c
+++ b/arch/arm/kernel/smp_scu.c
@@ -17,6 +17,7 @@
 #include <asm/cputype.h>
 
 #define SCU_CTRL		0x00
+#define SCU_CTRL_ENABLE		    BIT(1)
 #define SCU_CONFIG		0x04
 #define SCU_CPU_STATUS		0x08
 #define SCU_INVALIDATE		0x0c
@@ -43,17 +44,18 @@ void scu_enable(void __iomem *scu_base)
 	/* Cortex-A9 only */
 	if ((read_cpuid_id() & 0xff0ffff0) == 0x410fc090) {
 		scu_ctrl = readl_relaxed(scu_base + 0x30);
-		if (!(scu_ctrl & 1))
-			writel_relaxed(scu_ctrl | 0x1, scu_base + 0x30);
+		if (!(scu_ctrl & SCU_CTRL_ENABLE))
+			writel_relaxed(scu_ctrl | SCU_CTRL_ENABLE,
+				scu_base + 0x30);
 	}
 #endif
 
 	scu_ctrl = readl_relaxed(scu_base + SCU_CTRL);
 	/* already enabled? */
-	if (scu_ctrl & 1)
+	if (scu_ctrl & SCU_CTRL_ENABLE)
 		return;
 
-	scu_ctrl |= 1;
+	scu_ctrl |= SCU_CTRL_ENABLE;
 	writel_relaxed(scu_ctrl, scu_base + SCU_CTRL);
 
 	/*
-- 
1.8.1.2




More information about the linux-arm-kernel mailing list