[PATCH] ARM: mvebu: Enable SCU Speculative linefills to L2 for Armada 375/38x
Gregory CLEMENT
gregory.clement at free-electrons.com
Thu Jun 26 08:09:24 PDT 2014
Hi Thomas,
On 26/06/2014 16:52, Thomas Petazzoni wrote:
> Dear Gregory CLEMENT,
>
> On Thu, 26 Jun 2014 15:42:58 +0200, Gregory CLEMENT wrote:
>
>> +#define SCU_CTRL 0x00
>> +#define SCU_SPEC_LINEFILL_EN BIT(3)
>> +
>> +
>> /*
>> * Enables the SCU when available. Obviously, this is only useful on
>> * Cortex-A based SOCs, not on PJ4B based ones.
>> @@ -44,7 +48,15 @@ static void __init mvebu_scu_enable(void)
>> struct device_node *np =
>> of_find_compatible_node(NULL, NULL, "arm,cortex-a9-scu");
>> if (np) {
>> + u32 scu_ctrl;
>> scu_base = of_iomap(np, 0);
>> + /* already enabled? */
>> + scu_ctrl = __raw_readl(scu_base + SCU_CTRL);
>
> Unless the SCU uses the native endianess of the system, and therefore
> switches to big endian when the system is running big endian, using
> __raw_{readl,writel} is wrong here, and will break big endian
> configurations.
Yes you are right here.
>
>> + if (!(scu_ctrl & 1)) {
>
> What is this bit 0 you're checking here? How does it relate to the bit
> 3 you're setting when bit 0 is not set?
It is related to the comment just before: we checked if the SCU
is already enabled. So I guess we can't set the SCU Speculative linefills
bit if the SCU is enabled.
>
> A broader question is: if this feature is generic to all Cortex-A9, why
> not offer a function in smp_scu.c to enable it? It seems weird to have
> the offset and bit definitions for something as generic as the SCU
> present deep into a Marvell-specific file.
I have no strong opinion on it, and I also thoough about adding a function
in smp_scu.c but when you are looking at the usage of SCU is the kernel
the other SOC manipulate it directly.
Thanks,
Gregory
--
Gregory Clement, Free Electrons
Kernel, drivers, real-time and embedded Linux
development, consulting, training and support.
http://free-electrons.com
More information about the linux-arm-kernel
mailing list