[PATCH] of: Check for phys_addr_t overflows in early_init_dt_add_memory_arch
Laura Abbott
lauraa at codeaurora.org
Wed Jun 18 22:04:17 PDT 2014
The common early_init_dt_add_memory_arch takes the base and size
of a memory region as u64 types. The function never checks if
the base and size can actually fit in a phys_addr_t which may
be smaller than 64-bits. This may result in incorrect memory
being passed to memblock_add if the memory falls outside the
range of phys_addr_t. Add range checks for the base and size if
phys_addr_t is smaller than u64.
Reported-by: Geert Uytterhoeven <geert at linux-m68k.org>
Signed-off-by: Laura Abbott <lauraa at codeaurora.org>
---
Geert, can you drop my other patch and give this a test to see if it fixes
your bootup problem?
---
drivers/of/fdt.c | 15 +++++++++++++++
1 file changed, 15 insertions(+)
diff --git a/drivers/of/fdt.c b/drivers/of/fdt.c
index c4cddf0..f72132c 100644
--- a/drivers/of/fdt.c
+++ b/drivers/of/fdt.c
@@ -880,6 +880,21 @@ void __init __weak early_init_dt_add_memory_arch(u64 base, u64 size)
const u64 phys_offset = __pa(PAGE_OFFSET);
base &= PAGE_MASK;
size &= PAGE_MASK;
+
+#ifndef CONFIG_ARCH_PHYS_ADDR_T_64BIT
+ if (base > ULONG_MAX) {
+ pr_warning("Ignoring memory block 0x%llx - 0x%llx\n",
+ base, base + size);
+ return;
+ }
+
+ if (base + size > ULONG_MAX) {
+ pr_warning("Ignoring memory range 0x%lx - 0x%llx\n",
+ ULONG_MAX, base + size);
+ size = ULONG_MAX - base;
+ }
+#endif
+
if (base + size < phys_offset) {
pr_warning("Ignoring memory block 0x%llx - 0x%llx\n",
base, base + size);
--
The Qualcomm Innovation Center, Inc. is a member of the Code Aurora Forum,
hosted by The Linux Foundation
More information about the linux-arm-kernel
mailing list