[PATCH v15 06/12] document: dt: add the binding on HiP04 clock
haojian.zhuang at linaro.org
Tue Jul 29 03:40:18 PDT 2014
On 29 July 2014 17:55, Arnd Bergmann <arnd at arndb.de> wrote:
> On Tuesday 29 July 2014 10:25:49 Haojian Zhuang wrote:
>> On 29 July 2014 01:54, Mark Rutland <mark.rutland at arm.com> wrote:
>> > On Mon, Jul 28, 2014 at 02:57:50PM +0100, Haojian Zhuang wrote:
>> >> The DT binding for Hisilicon HiP04 clock driver.
>> >> Signed-off-by: Haojian Zhuang <haojian.zhuang at linaro.org>
>> >> ---
>> >> .../devicetree/bindings/clock/hip04-clock.txt | 20 ++++++++++++++++++++
>> >> 1 file changed, 20 insertions(+)
>> >> create mode 100644 Documentation/devicetree/bindings/clock/hip04-clock.txt
>> >> diff --git a/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/clock/hip04-clock.txt b/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/clock/hip04-clock.txt
>> >> new file mode 100644
>> >> index 0000000..4d31ae3
>> >> --- /dev/null
>> >> +++ b/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/clock/hip04-clock.txt
>> >> @@ -0,0 +1,20 @@
>> >> +* Hisilicon HiP04 Clock Controller
>> >> +
>> >> +The HiP04 clock controller generates and supplies clock to various
>> >> +controllers within the HiP04 SoC.
>> >> +
>> >> +Required Properties:
>> >> +
>> >> +- compatible: should be one of the following.
>> >> + - "hisilicon,hip04-clock" - controller compatible with HiP04 SoC.
>> > There's only one clock controller on-board and it's custom for HiP04?
>> Since all those PLL settings are configured in bootloader, kernel
>> don't need to configure it again.
>> By the way, I don't have the manual to configure those PLLs. All the clocks
>> are defined as fixed in kernel side.
> If all the clocks are fixed-rate, you don't actually need a driver
> for them, just use the regular fixed-rate clock and define one
> node per clock.
OK. I'll update it.
More information about the linux-arm-kernel