[PATCH v2 14/15] watchdog: orion: Allow to build on any Orion platform

[Ezequiel Garcia]

Hi Andrew, Sebastian:

On Tue, Jan 21, 2014 at 10:45:01AM +0100, Andrew Lunn wrote:
> On Tue, Jan 21, 2014 at 10:41:17AM +0100, Sebastian Hesselbarth wrote:
> > On 01/21/14 10:12, Ezequiel Garcia wrote:
> > >After getting rid of all the mach-specific code, it's now possible
> > >to allow builds in any Orion platform.
> > >
> > >Signed-off-by: Ezequiel Garcia <ezequiel.garcia at free-electrons.com>
> > >---
> > >  drivers/watchdog/Kconfig | 2 +-
> > >  1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 1 deletion(-)
> > >
> > >diff --git a/drivers/watchdog/Kconfig b/drivers/watchdog/Kconfig
> > >index 5be6e91..1689f72 100644
> > >--- a/drivers/watchdog/Kconfig
> > >+++ b/drivers/watchdog/Kconfig
> > >@@ -282,7 +282,7 @@ config DAVINCI_WATCHDOG
> > >
> > >  config ORION_WATCHDOG
> > >  	tristate "Orion watchdog"
> > >-	depends on ARCH_ORION5X || ARCH_KIRKWOOD || ARCH_DOVE
> > >+	depends on PLAT_ORION
[..]
> > 
> > while above is true now, I tend to rather have ARCH_MVEBU added here.
> > We really want to get rid of both !ARCH_MVEBU and PLAT_ORION and this
> > unnecessarily will make it more complicated.
> > 
> > I haven't checked why ARCH_MVEBU at all added PLAT_ORION as dependency,
> > but IIRC it was just because of a missing mbus driver? If it is just
> > this, we should also remove PLAT_ORION from ARCH_MVEBU to have a clean
> > cut between new common arch and existing sub-archs.
> 

Hm... not sure why we depend on PLAT_ORION. I'll take a look.

> I took a look at this when moving DT kirkwood into mach-mvebu. There
> is nothing in plat-orion which ARCH_MVEBU needs. So i agree with
> Sebastian, it should be PLAT_ORION || ARCH_MVEBU.
> 

OK, will do.

Thanks!
-- 
Ezequiel García, Free Electrons
Embedded Linux, Kernel and Android Engineering
http://free-electrons.com