[PATCH v2 14/15] watchdog: orion: Allow to build on any Orion platform

Andrew Lunn andrew at lunn.ch
Tue Jan 21 04:45:01 EST 2014


On Tue, Jan 21, 2014 at 10:41:17AM +0100, Sebastian Hesselbarth wrote:
> On 01/21/14 10:12, Ezequiel Garcia wrote:
> >After getting rid of all the mach-specific code, it's now possible
> >to allow builds in any Orion platform.
> >
> >Signed-off-by: Ezequiel Garcia <ezequiel.garcia at free-electrons.com>
> >---
> >  drivers/watchdog/Kconfig | 2 +-
> >  1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 1 deletion(-)
> >
> >diff --git a/drivers/watchdog/Kconfig b/drivers/watchdog/Kconfig
> >index 5be6e91..1689f72 100644
> >--- a/drivers/watchdog/Kconfig
> >+++ b/drivers/watchdog/Kconfig
> >@@ -282,7 +282,7 @@ config DAVINCI_WATCHDOG
> >
> >  config ORION_WATCHDOG
> >  	tristate "Orion watchdog"
> >-	depends on ARCH_ORION5X || ARCH_KIRKWOOD || ARCH_DOVE
> >+	depends on PLAT_ORION
> 
> Ezequiel,
> 
> while above is true now, I tend to rather have ARCH_MVEBU added here.
> We really want to get rid of both !ARCH_MVEBU and PLAT_ORION and this
> unnecessarily will make it more complicated.
> 
> I haven't checked why ARCH_MVEBU at all added PLAT_ORION as dependency,
> but IIRC it was just because of a missing mbus driver? If it is just
> this, we should also remove PLAT_ORION from ARCH_MVEBU to have a clean
> cut between new common arch and existing sub-archs.

I took a look at this when moving DT kirkwood into mach-mvebu. There
is nothing in plat-orion which ARCH_MVEBU needs. So i agree with
Sebastian, it should be PLAT_ORION || ARCH_MVEBU.

	   Andrew



More information about the linux-arm-kernel mailing list