[PATCHv13 00/40] ARM: TI SoC clock DT conversion

[Tero Kristo]

On 01/15/2014 05:50 AM, Mike Turquette wrote:
> Quoting Mike Turquette (2014-01-14 19:16:32)
>> Quoting Felipe Balbi (2014-01-14 18:04:21)
>>> Hi,
>>>
>>> On Tue, Jan 14, 2014 at 02:36:13PM -0600, Felipe Balbi wrote:
>>>>> Felipe, care to run your randconfig magic for this?
>>>>
>>>> This branch builds just fine so far, I still have omap5 multiplaform and
>>>> uniplatform builds, but since that was working before i'm assuming it
>>>> won't break.
>>>
>>> No build failures in any of my 18 seeds (5 randconfigs of each), I'd
>>> attach logs, but it's a 2.8MiB tarball, if anyone cares enough, I can
>>> send it.
>>>
>>> FWIW:
>>>
>>> Acked-by: Felipe Balbi <balbi at ti.com>
>>
>> Felipe,
>>
>> That's great to hear. Thanks for testing.
>>
>> Tero & Tony,
>>
>> These 40 patches apply very cleanly on top of clk-next with 2
>> exceptions:
>>
>> 1) I did not apply "[PATCH 30/42] ARM: dts: AM35xx: use DT clock data"
>> because I do not have arch/arm/boot/dts/am3517.dtsi in clk-next (based
>> on 3.13-rc1).
>>
>> 2) Minor merge conflict in arch/arm/boot/dts/omap3.dtsi which I think I
>> resolved correctly but would like verification.
>>
>> I'd prefer to simply merge these patches into clk-next, which is the
>> most straightforward route. Any ideas on how to handle the missing
>> AM35xx dtsi data? It can always go as a separate fix after this stuff
>> gets merged which, ironically, is how that file was created in the first
>> place.
>
> I've pushed my branch. Tero can you take a look and let me know if you
> see any problems?
>
> git://git.linaro.org/people/mike.turquette/linux.git clk-next-omap

Hey Mike,

Can't see any issues there, also gave it a quick boot test with the 
boards I have access to and seems to work fine.

-Tero

>
> Thanks!
> Mike
>
>>
>> Regards,
>> Mike
>>
>>>
>>> cheers
>>>
>>> --
>>> balbi