[PATCHv13 00/40] ARM: TI SoC clock DT conversion

Mike Turquette mturquette at linaro.org
Tue Jan 14 22:50:11 EST 2014


Quoting Mike Turquette (2014-01-14 19:16:32)
> Quoting Felipe Balbi (2014-01-14 18:04:21)
> > Hi,
> > 
> > On Tue, Jan 14, 2014 at 02:36:13PM -0600, Felipe Balbi wrote:
> > > > Felipe, care to run your randconfig magic for this?
> > > 
> > > This branch builds just fine so far, I still have omap5 multiplaform and
> > > uniplatform builds, but since that was working before i'm assuming it
> > > won't break.
> > 
> > No build failures in any of my 18 seeds (5 randconfigs of each), I'd
> > attach logs, but it's a 2.8MiB tarball, if anyone cares enough, I can
> > send it.
> > 
> > FWIW:
> > 
> > Acked-by: Felipe Balbi <balbi at ti.com>
> 
> Felipe,
> 
> That's great to hear. Thanks for testing.
> 
> Tero & Tony,
> 
> These 40 patches apply very cleanly on top of clk-next with 2
> exceptions:
> 
> 1) I did not apply "[PATCH 30/42] ARM: dts: AM35xx: use DT clock data"
> because I do not have arch/arm/boot/dts/am3517.dtsi in clk-next (based
> on 3.13-rc1).
> 
> 2) Minor merge conflict in arch/arm/boot/dts/omap3.dtsi which I think I
> resolved correctly but would like verification.
> 
> I'd prefer to simply merge these patches into clk-next, which is the
> most straightforward route. Any ideas on how to handle the missing
> AM35xx dtsi data? It can always go as a separate fix after this stuff
> gets merged which, ironically, is how that file was created in the first
> place.

I've pushed my branch. Tero can you take a look and let me know if you
see any problems?

git://git.linaro.org/people/mike.turquette/linux.git clk-next-omap

Thanks!
Mike

> 
> Regards,
> Mike
> 
> > 
> > cheers
> > 
> > -- 
> > balbi



More information about the linux-arm-kernel mailing list