[PATCH v4 1/2] ARM: avoid tracers in soft_restart

[Sebastian Capella]

Quoting Russell King - ARM Linux (2014-02-26 15:37:44)
> On Wed, Feb 26, 2014 at 11:10:56AM -0800, Sebastian Capella wrote:
> > Use of tracers in local_irq_disable is causes recursive aborts when
> > called with irqs disabled and using a temporary stack (hibernation).
> > Replace local_irq_disable with raw_local_irq_disable instead to
> > avoid tracers.
> > 
> > Signed-off-by: Sebastian Capella <sebastian.capella at linaro.org>
> > Cc: Russell King <linux at arm.linux.org.uk>
> > Cc: Andrew Morton <akpm at linux-foundation.org>
> > Cc: Thomas Gleixner <tglx at linutronix.de>
> > Cc: Will Deacon <will.deacon at arm.com>
> > Cc: Robin Holt <robin.m.holt at gmail.com>
> > Cc: Lorenzo Pieralisi <lorenzo.pieralisi at arm.com>
> > ---
> >  arch/arm/kernel/process.c |    2 +-
> >  1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 1 deletion(-)
> > 
> > diff --git a/arch/arm/kernel/process.c b/arch/arm/kernel/process.c
> > index 92f7b15..f58b723 100644
> > --- a/arch/arm/kernel/process.c
> > +++ b/arch/arm/kernel/process.c
> > @@ -100,7 +100,7 @@ void soft_restart(unsigned long addr)
> >       u64 *stack = soft_restart_stack + ARRAY_SIZE(soft_restart_stack);
> >  
> >       /* Disable interrupts first */
> > -     local_irq_disable();
> > +     raw_local_irq_disable();
> >       local_fiq_disable();
> 
> Great, I'm happy with this now.  I assume that the plan is to submit this
> to my patch system when everyone's given their fill of acks?

Thanks Russell!

I'll look into how to send it to your patch system and wait for people
to respond.

Sebastian Capella