[PATCH v8 03/14] mfd: omap-usb-host: Use clock names as per function for reference clocks

[Roger Quadros]

On 02/25/2014 11:18 AM, Lee Jones wrote:
>>>> Use a meaningful name for the reference clocks so that it indicates the function.
>>>>
>>>> CC: Lee Jones <lee.jones at linaro.org>
>>>> CC: Samuel Ortiz <sameo at linux.intel.com>
>>>> Signed-off-by: Roger Quadros <rogerq at ti.com>
>>>> ---
>>>>  drivers/mfd/omap-usb-host.c | 12 ++++++------
>>>>  1 file changed, 6 insertions(+), 6 deletions(-)
>>>>
>>>> diff --git a/drivers/mfd/omap-usb-host.c b/drivers/mfd/omap-usb-host.c
>>>> index 865c276..651e249 100644
>>>> --- a/drivers/mfd/omap-usb-host.c
>>>> +++ b/drivers/mfd/omap-usb-host.c
>>>> @@ -718,24 +718,24 @@ static int usbhs_omap_probe(struct platform_device *pdev)
>>>>  		goto err_mem;
>>>>  	}
>>>>  
>>>> -	omap->xclk60mhsp1_ck = devm_clk_get(dev, "xclk60mhsp1_ck");
>>>> +	omap->xclk60mhsp1_ck = devm_clk_get(dev, "refclk_60m_ext_p1");
>>>>  	if (IS_ERR(omap->xclk60mhsp1_ck)) {
>>>>  		ret = PTR_ERR(omap->xclk60mhsp1_ck);
>>>> -		dev_err(dev, "xclk60mhsp1_ck failed error:%d\n", ret);
>>>> +		dev_err(dev, "refclk_60m_ext_p1 failed error:%d\n", ret);
>>>>  		goto err_mem;
>>>>  	}
>>>
>>> Will anything break if I were to apply the MFD patches seperately?
>>>
>>
>> Nothing will break for OMAP3, but OMAP4 USB host will break (e.g. Panda board).
>> OMAP5 USB host was never working so it doesn't matter there.
>>
>> To make sure nothing breaks, we need at least these 2 patches to go in together with mfd changes.
>>
>> [PATCH v8 08/14] ARM: dts: omap4: Update omap-usb-host node
>> [PATCH v8 09/14] ARM: dts: omap5: Update omap-usb-host node
>>
>> Any suggestions about how we can proceed?
> 
> Yes, unfortunately you have to squash each of the patches into one
> patch. Applying a patch which breaks a build, then applying another one
> immediately after which subsequently fixes the break is not an acceptable
> way of working I'm afraid. What would happen if we were to fall into
> the middle of the two patches when bisecting?
> 

OK, I'll squash patches 8 and 9 into patch 3.

cheers,
-roger