[GIT PULL 00/12] Second Round of Renesas ARM Based SoC Updates for v3.15

[Simon Horman]

On Fri, Feb 21, 2014 at 02:25:44PM -0800, Olof Johansson wrote:
> On Thu, Feb 20, 2014 at 01:43:24AM -0800, Olof Johansson wrote:
> > On Thu, Feb 13, 2014 at 05:04:56PM +0900, Simon Horman wrote:
> > > Hi Olof, Hi Kevin, Hi Arnd,
> > > 
> > > please consider this second round of Renesas ARM Based SoC updates for v3.15.
> > > 
> > > This pull-request is based on the first round of such changes,
> > > tagged as renesas-soc-for-v3.15, which I have previously sent a
> > > pull-request for.
> > > 
> > > 
> > > The following changes since commit 012a7069b5a10a0851584d71a1facdc40a972319:
> > > 
> > >   ARM: shmobile: r8a7790: Add PCI USB host clock support (2014-02-04 10:25:03 +0900)
> > > 
> > > are available in the git repository at:
> > > 
> > >   git://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/horms/renesas.git tags/renesas-soc2-for-v3.15
> > 
> > Hi,
> > 
> > I'm stopping my merges for the night here, so I haven't merged this but I'll
> > likely do it tomorrow. I did have comments on one of the patches though (that
> > adds a new include/mach file that's not really needed). Fixing that can be done
> > incrementally though, especially if you have downstream users of this branch.
> 
> Simon,
> 
> I think it'd fit our workflow better if you kept all the clock changes in
> a topic branch this release, instead of mingling them with the SoC code.
> There is enough of them that it's not just a silly short branch, and there's
> little overlap with the rest of the soc code changes you have (i.e. it makes
> more sense for us to merge in with a drivers branch instead of keeping it all
> with soc).
> 
> Would you mind respinning and sorting that out to a separate topic? Since
> I've already merged the first soc branch (but treated it like a clock
> branch), feel free to keep that as a base for the new clock branch
> (but not for the new soc branch, ideally).

Sure, I will see about doing that.

In the mean time, please disregard "Third Round of Renesas ARM Based SoC
Updates", which I sent before I saw this email.

I think that all the other pull-request that I sent yesterday
should be unaffected by this change.