[PATCH v5 2/5] ACPI / processor_core: Rework _PDC related stuff to make it more arch-independent
Rafael J. Wysocki
rjw at rjwysocki.net
Fri Feb 21 18:35:02 EST 2014
On Friday, February 21, 2014 06:24:24 PM Catalin Marinas wrote:
> Hi Rafael,
> On Wed, Feb 19, 2014 at 01:50:22AM +0100, Rafael J. Wysocki wrote:
> > On Wednesday, February 19, 2014 12:23:55 AM Hanjun Guo wrote:
> > > _PDC related stuff in processor_core.c is little bit X86/IA64 dependent,
> > > rework the code to make it more arch-independent, no functional change
> > > in this patch.
> > >
> > > Signed-off-by: Hanjun Guo <hanjun.guo at linaro.org>
> > > Signed-off-by: Graeme Gregory <graeme.gregory at linaro.org>
> > I've queued up patches [1,3-5/5] from this series for 3.15 (modulo changelog
> > modifications), but this one should be CCed to the x86 and ia64 maintainers.
> Thanks for taking these patches. I would however hold onto patch 3/5 as
> this is still under discussion. Basically for patches specific to ARM
> ACPI I would really like to see more acks before being merged as that's
> a new thing for us.
OK, I'll drop [3/5] for now, then.
I'm wondering, though, whose ACKs I should be waiting for before applying those
More information about the linux-arm-kernel