pci-mvebu driver on km_kirkwood

[Thomas Petazzoni]

Dear Jason Gunthorpe,

On Thu, 20 Feb 2014 17:32:27 -0700, Jason Gunthorpe wrote:

> > In practice, the story is a little bit more subtle than that: the PCIe
> > driver may want to decide to either tell the PCI core to enlarge the
> > window BAR up to the next power of two size, or to dedicate two windows
> > to it.
> 
> That is a smart, easy solution! Maybe that is the least invasive way
> to proceed for now?

So you suggest that the mvebu-mbus driver should accept a
non power-of-two window size, and do internally the job of cutting that
into several power-of-two sized areas and creating the corresponding
windows?

> I have no idea how you decide when to round up and when to allocate
> more windows, that feels like a fairly complex optimization problem!

Yes, it is a fairly complex problem. I was thinking of a threshold of
"lost space". Below this threshold, it's better to enlarge the window,
above the threshold it's better to create two windows. But not easy.

> Alternatively, I suspect you can use the PCI quirk mechanism to alter
> the resource sizing on a bridge?

Can you give more details about this mechanism, and how it could be
used to alter the size of resources on a bridge?

> > Jason, would you mind maybe replying to Bjorn Helgaas email (Thu, 20
> > Feb 2014 12:18:42 -0700) ? I believe that a lot of the misunderstanding
> > between Bjorn and me is due to the fact that I don't use the correct
> > PCI terminology to describe how the Marvell hardware works, and how the
> > Marvell PCIe driver copes with it. I'm sure you would explain it in a
> > way that would be more easily understood by someone very familiar with
> > the PCI terminology such as Bjorn. Thanks a lot!
> 
> Done!

Thanks a lot! Really appreciated.

Best regards,

Thomas
-- 
Thomas Petazzoni, CTO, Free Electrons
Embedded Linux, Kernel and Android engineering
http://free-electrons.com