[PATCH v9 1/6] arm64: Add macros to manage processor debug state
Vijay Kilari
vijay.kilari at gmail.com
Fri Feb 21 00:19:25 EST 2014
Hi Catalin,
On Thu, Feb 20, 2014 at 9:57 PM, Catalin Marinas
<catalin.marinas at arm.com> wrote:
> On Thu, Feb 20, 2014 at 03:56:00PM +0000, Will Deacon wrote:
>> On Thu, Feb 20, 2014 at 12:22:14PM +0000, Vijay Kilari wrote:
>> > On Thu, Feb 20, 2014 at 5:12 PM, Will Deacon <will.deacon at arm.com> wrote:
>> > > On Thu, Feb 20, 2014 at 06:58:25AM +0000, Vijay Kilari wrote:
>> > >> --- a/arch/arm64/kernel/smp.c
>> > >> +++ b/arch/arm64/kernel/smp.c
>> > >> @@ -160,6 +160,8 @@ asmlinkage void secondary_start_kernel(void)
>> > >> set_cpu_online(cpu, true);
>> > >> complete(&cpu_running);
>> > >>
>> > >> + local_dbg_enable();
>> > >> local_irq_enable();
>> > >> local_async_enable();
>> > >
>> > > The only thing to add then moving the isb(); local_dbg_enable() out of
>> > > clear_os_lock and into debug_monitors_init. You can probably make the
>> > > smp_call_function an on_each_cpu too.
>> > >
>> > > Does that make sense?
>> >
>> > Its ok for me. Isn't require to have isb() after clearing os lock for
>> > every cpu?
>> > Just having isb on cpu0 after clearing os lock is enough?
>>
>> They'll synchronise on return from the IPI.
>>
>> > --- a/arch/arm64/kernel/debug-monitors.c
>> > +++ b/arch/arm64/kernel/debug-monitors.c
>> > @@ -137,8 +137,6 @@ void disable_debug_monitors(enum debug_el el)
>> > static void clear_os_lock(void *unused)
>> > {
>> > asm volatile("msr oslar_el1, %0" : : "r" (0));
>> > - isb();
>> > - local_dbg_enable();
>> > }
>> >
>> > static int os_lock_notify(struct notifier_block *self,
>> > @@ -157,8 +155,9 @@ static struct notifier_block os_lock_nb = {
>> > static int debug_monitors_init(void)
>> > {
>> > /* Clear the OS lock. */
>> > - smp_call_function(clear_os_lock, NULL, 1);
>> > - clear_os_lock(NULL);
>> > + on_each_cpu(clear_os_lock, NULL, 1);
>> > + isb();
>> > + local_dbg_enable();
>> >
>> > /* Register hotplug handler. */
>> > register_cpu_notifier(&os_lock_nb);
>> > diff --git a/arch/arm64/kernel/smp.c b/arch/arm64/kernel/smp.c
>> > index 7cfb92a..5070dc3 100644
>> > --- a/arch/arm64/kernel/smp.c
>> > +++ b/arch/arm64/kernel/smp.c
>> > @@ -160,6 +160,7 @@ asmlinkage void secondary_start_kernel(void)
>> > set_cpu_online(cpu, true);
>> > complete(&cpu_running);
>> >
>> > + local_dbg_enable();
>> > local_irq_enable();
>> > local_async_enable();
>> >
>> > Is this ok?
>>
>> Looks good to me:
>>
>> Acked-by: Will Deacon <will.deacon at arm.com>
>
> Vijay, could you please post a commit log together with the above patch
> (and Will's ack) so that I can merge it on top of your other patches?
>
I have sent a patch for this fix named, " [PATCH 1/1] arm64: enable processor
debug state for secondary cpus".
Please apply this on top of other patches.
Thanks
- Vijay
> Thanks.
>
> --
> Catalin
More information about the linux-arm-kernel
mailing list